Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jul;20(7):984-997. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30150-0. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
Patients with relapsed or refractory FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD)-positive acute myeloid leukaemia have a poor prognosis, including high frequency of relapse, poorer response to salvage therapy, and shorter overall survival than those with FLT3 wild-type disease. We aimed to assess whether single-agent quizartinib, an oral, highly potent and selective type II FLT3 inhibitor, improves overall survival versus salvage chemotherapy.
QuANTUM-R is a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial done at 152 hospitals and cancer centres in 19 countries. Eligible patients aged 18 years or older with ECOG performance status 0-2 with relapsed or refractory (duration of first composite complete remission ≤6 months) FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukaemia after standard therapy with or without allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation were randomly assigned (2:1; permuted block size of 6; stratified by response to previous therapy and choice of chemotherapy via a phone-based and web-based interactive response system) to quizartinib (60 mg [30 mg lead-in] orally once daily) or investigator's choice of preselected chemotherapy: subcutaneous low-dose cytarabine (subcutaneous injection of cytarabine 20 mg twice daily on days 1-10 of 28-day cycles); intravenous infusions of mitoxantrone (8 mg/m per day), etoposide (100 mg/m per day), and cytarabine (1000 mg/m per day on days 1-5 of up to two 28-day cycles); or intravenous granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (300 μg/m per day or 5 μg/kg per day subcutaneously on days 1-5), fludarabine (intravenous infusion 30 mg/m per day on days 2-6), cytarabine (intravenous infusion 2000 mg/m per day on days 2-6), and idarubicin (intravenous infusion 10 mg/m per day on days 2-4 in up to two 28-day cycles). Patients proceeding to haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation after quizartinib could resume quizartinib after haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02039726, and follow-up is ongoing.
Between May 7, 2014, and Sept 13, 2017, 367 patients were enrolled, of whom 245 were randomly allocated to quizartinib and 122 to chemotherapy. Four patients in the quizartinib group and 28 in the chemotherapy group were not treated. Median follow-up was 23·5 months (IQR 15·4-32·3). Overall survival was longer for quizartinib than for chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0·76 [95% CI 0·58-0·98; p=0·02]). Median overall survival was 6·2 months (5·3-7·2) in the quizartinib group and 4·7 months (4·0-5·5) in the chemotherapy group. The most common non-haematological grade 3-5 treatment-emergent adverse events (within ≤30 days of last dose or >30 days if suspected to be a treatment-related event) for quizartinib (241 patients) and chemotherapy (94 patients) were sepsis or septic shock (46 patients [19%] for quizartinib vs 18 [19%] for chemotherapy), pneumonia (29 [12%] vs eight [9%]), and hypokalaemia (28 [12%] vs eight [9%]). The most frequent treatment-related serious adverse events were febrile neutropenia (18 patients [7%]), sepsis or septic shock (11 [5%]), QT prolongation (five [2%]), and nausea (five [2%]) in the quizartinib group, and febrile neutropenia (five [5%]), sepsis or septic shock (four [4%]), pneumonia (two [2%]), and pyrexia (two [2%]) in the chemotherapy group. Grade 3 QT prolongation in the quizartinib group was uncommon (eight [3%] by central reading, ten [4%] by investigator report); no grade 4 events occurred. There were 80 (33%) treatment-emergent deaths in the quizartinib group (31 [13%] of which were due to adverse events) and 16 (17%) in the chemotherapy group (nine [10%] of which were due to adverse events).
Treatment with quizartinib had a survival benefit versus salvage chemotherapy and had a manageable safety profile in patients with rapidly proliferative disease and very poor prognosis. Quizartinib could be considered a new standard of care. Given that there are only a few available treatment options, this study highlights the value of targeting the FLT3-ITD driver mutation with a highly potent and selective FLT3 inhibitor.
Daiichi Sankyo.
FLT3 内部串联重复(FLT3-ITD)阳性复发性或难治性急性髓系白血病患者预后较差,包括复发频率高、挽救性治疗反应较差以及总生存期较 FLT3 野生型疾病患者更短。我们旨在评估单药 quizartinib(一种口服、高活性和选择性 II 型 FLT3 抑制剂)与挽救性化疗相比是否能改善总生存期。
QUANTUM-R 是一项在 19 个国家的 152 家医院和癌症中心进行的随机、对照、III 期试验。年龄在 18 岁或以上、ECOG 表现状态为 0-2、在标准治疗后复发或难治(首次复合完全缓解持续时间≤6 个月)、伴有 FLT3-ITD 的急性髓系白血病且接受过或未接受过异基因造血干细胞移植的患者,按 2:1 的比例(随机分配;使用电话和基于网络的交互式响应系统通过分层选择前次治疗的反应和化疗药物)随机分配至 quizartinib(60mg[30mg 导入期]每日一次口服)或研究者选择的预先选定的化疗药物:皮下低剂量阿糖胞苷(28 天周期中第 1-10 天每日两次皮下注射阿糖胞苷,剂量为 20mg);米托蒽醌(每天 8mg/m2)、依托泊苷(每天 100mg/m2)和阿糖胞苷(第 1-5 天每天 1000mg/m2,最多两个 28 天周期);或粒细胞集落刺激因子(每天 300μg/m2 或每天 5μg/kg 皮下注射,第 1-5 天)、氟达拉滨(每天 30mg/m2,第 2-6 天静脉输注)、阿糖胞苷(第 2-6 天静脉输注,剂量为 2000mg/m2)和伊达比星(第 2-4 天静脉输注,剂量为 10mg/m2,最多两个 28 天周期)。在接受 quizartinib 治疗后进行造血干细胞移植的患者可以在造血干细胞移植后继续接受 quizartinib 治疗。主要终点是在意向治疗人群中的总生存期。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT02039726,随访正在进行中。
2014 年 5 月 7 日至 2017 年 9 月 13 日期间,共纳入 367 名患者,其中 245 名患者随机分配至 quizartinib 组,122 名患者分配至化疗组。4 名 quizartinib 组患者和 28 名化疗组患者未接受治疗。中位随访时间为 23.5 个月(IQR 15.4-32.3)。与化疗相比,quizartinib 的总生存期更长(风险比 0.76[95%CI 0.58-0.98;p=0.02])。在 quizartinib 组中位总生存期为 6.2 个月(5.3-7.2),在化疗组为 4.7 个月(4.0-5.5)。在接受 quizartinib(241 名患者)和化疗(94 名患者)治疗的患者中,最常见的非血液学 3-5 级治疗相关不良事件(在最后一剂药物≤30 天或疑似与治疗相关的事件>30 天)是败血症或感染性休克(46 名患者[19%]quizartinib 组与 18 名[19%]化疗组)、肺炎(29 名[12%]quizartinib 组与 8 名[9%]化疗组)和低钾血症(28 名[12%]quizartinib 组与 8 名[9%]化疗组)。在 quizartinib 组中最常见的与治疗相关的严重不良事件是发热性中性粒细胞减少症(18 名患者[7%])、败血症或感染性休克(11 名[5%])、QT 间期延长(5 名[2%])和恶心(5 名[2%]),在化疗组中是发热性中性粒细胞减少症(5 名[5%])、败血症或感染性休克(4 名[4%])、肺炎(2 名[2%])和发热(2 名[2%])。quizartinib 组中罕见(中央读数为 3%,研究者报告为 4%)的 3 级 QT 间期延长,没有 4 级事件发生。在 quizartinib 组中有 80 例(33%)治疗相关死亡(其中 31 例[13%]死亡与不良事件有关),化疗组中有 16 例(17%)死亡(其中 9 例[10%]死亡与不良事件有关)。
与挽救性化疗相比,quizartinib 治疗具有生存获益,且在疾病增殖迅速且预后极差的患者中具有可管理的安全性。Quizartinib 可以作为新的标准治疗方案。鉴于仅有少数治疗选择,这项研究强调了针对 FLT3-ITD 驱动突变使用高活性和选择性 FLT3 抑制剂的价值。
Daiichi Sankyo。