a Institute of Sport Exercise & Health , University College London , London , UK.
b Department of Sport & Exercise Science , University of Portsmouth , Portsmouth , UK.
Ann Med. 2019 May-Jun;51(3-4):232-251. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2019.1628352. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
Dehydration appears prevalent, costly and associated with adverse outcomes. We sought to generate consensus on such key issues and elucidate need for further scientific enquiry. A modified Delphi process combined expert opinion and evidence appraisal. Twelve relevant experts addressed dehydration's definition, objective markers and impact on physiology and outcome. Fifteen consensus statements and seven research recommendations were generated. Key findings, evidenced in detail, were that there is no universally accepted definition for dehydration; hydration assessment is complex and requires combining physiological and laboratory variables; "dehydration" and "hypovolaemia" are incorrectly used interchangeably; abnormal hydration status includes and/or abnormalities in body water and serum/plasma osmolality (pOsm); raised pOsm usually indicates dehydration; direct measurement of pOsm is the gold standard for determining dehydration; pOsm >300 and ≤280 mOsm/kg classifies a person as hyper or hypo-osmolar; outside extremes, signs of adult dehydration are subtle and unreliable; dehydration is common in hospitals and care homes and associated with poorer outcomes. Dehydration poses risk to public health. Dehydration is under-recognized and poorly managed in hospital and community-based care. Further research is required to improve assessment and management of dehydration and the authors have made recommendations to focus academic endeavours. Key messages Dehydration assessment is a major clinical challenge due to a complex, varying pathophysiology, non-specific clinical presentations and the lack of international consensus on definition and diagnosis. Plasma osmolality represents a valuable, objective surrogate marker of hypertonic dehydration which is underutilized in clinical practice. Dehydration is prevalent within the healthcare setting and in the community, and appears associated with increased morbidity and mortality.
脱水现象普遍存在,代价高昂,并与不良结局相关。我们旨在就这些关键问题达成共识,并阐明进一步开展科学研究的必要性。采用改良 Delphi 法结合专家意见和证据评估。12 名相关专家就脱水的定义、客观标志物以及对生理和结局的影响进行了探讨。共提出了 15 项共识声明和 7 项研究建议。详细证据表明,目前尚无普遍接受的脱水定义;水合评估复杂,需要结合生理和实验室变量;“脱水”和“血容量不足”错误地互换使用;异常水合状态包括体内水和血清/血浆渗透压(pOsm)异常;升高的 pOsm 通常提示脱水;直接测量 pOsm 是确定脱水的金标准;pOsm>300 且≤280 mOsm/kg 可将个体归类为高渗或低渗;在极端情况之外,成人脱水的迹象细微且不可靠;医院和养老院中脱水很常见,与较差的结局相关。脱水对公共健康构成威胁。医院和社区医疗保健中脱水的识别和管理不足,需要进一步研究以改善脱水的评估和管理,作者已提出建议,以集中学术努力。关键信息 由于复杂多变的病理生理学、非特异性临床表现以及缺乏国际共识的定义和诊断,脱水评估是一项重大临床挑战。血浆渗透压是高渗性脱水有价值的客观替代标志物,但在临床实践中未得到充分利用。脱水在医疗保健环境和社区中普遍存在,似乎与发病率和死亡率增加相关。