At the Alborz University of Medical Sciences, in Karaj, Iran, Leila Sadati, MScN, BScN, is a faculty member, Paramedic School; Robab Froozesh, MScN, BScN, is a Neonatal Intensive Care Nurse, Paramedic School; Zahra Nouri Khaneghah, MSc, is a faculty member, Paramedic School; and Seyed Ahmad Elahi, MD, is faculty member, Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine. At the Iran University of Medical Sciences in Tehran, Iran, Alireza Beyrami, MSc, and Mohammad Faryab Asl, MSc, are Operating Room Technologists, Faculty of Allied Medicine. Tannaz Salehi, MSc, is a Master's Student of Medical Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2019 Jul;32(7):1-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000558268.59745.d2.
To evaluate the effect of different dressing methods on the wound healing process after pilonidal sinus surgery.
In this clinical trial, 60 patients undergoing pilonidal sinus surgery were randomly assigned to one of three groups. In the first group, hydrogel or alginate and hydrocolloid compounds were used as a standard occlusive dressing method. A modified dressing method was used for the second group, in which transparent hydrocolloid films were replaced by Vaseline gauze. The third group was treated using gauze swabs soaked in normal saline. The length and depth of the studied wounds were recorded once a week for a month. During dressing changes, patient pain was recorded using an 11-point numeric rating scale. The collected data were analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistical methods.
There was a significant reduction in wound length after 2 weeks in all three groups (P < .05), and the pain experienced by the first and second groups was significantly lower than the third group. However, the modified method used for the second group was associated with a lower cost.
Considering the beneficial results of using modern dressings for wound healing and reducing the severity of associated pain, providers may want to consider using modified wound dressings after pilonidal sinus surgery. Study authors recommend that providers receive training on how to use these products.
评估不同敷贴方式对肛门部藏毛窦术后伤口愈合过程的影响。
本临床试验纳入 60 例行肛门部藏毛窦手术的患者,随机分为三组。第 1 组采用水凝胶或藻酸盐与水胶体复合物作为标准封闭敷贴方式,第 2 组采用改良敷贴方式,即用凡士林纱布代替透明水胶体薄膜,第 3 组采用生理盐水浸湿的纱布拭子。术后每周记录伤口的长度和深度 1 次,共 1 个月。在更换敷贴时,采用 11 点数字评分法记录患者疼痛程度。采用描述性和推断性统计方法对收集的数据进行分析。
所有 3 组患者术后 2 周时伤口长度均显著缩短(P <.05),第 1 组和第 2 组的疼痛程度明显低于第 3 组,但是第 2 组的改良方法成本更低。
考虑到使用现代敷贴促进伤口愈合并减轻相关疼痛的有益效果,临床医生可能希望在肛门部藏毛窦术后采用改良的伤口敷贴。作者建议为临床医生提供有关如何使用这些产品的培训。