State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Shangxia Street 15, Changshan District, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2019 Oct;139:106540. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106540. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
To advance our knowledge of orchid relationships and timing of their relative divergence, we used 76 protein-coding genes from plastomes (ptCDS) and 38 protein-coding genes from mitochondrial genomes (mtCDS) of 74 orchids representing the five subfamilies and 18 tribes of Orchidaceae, to reconstruct the phylogeny and temporal evolution of the Orchidaceae. In our results, the backbone of orchid tree well supported with both datasets, but there are conflicts between these trees. The phylogenetic positions of two subfamilies (Vanilloideae and Cypripedioideae) are reversed in these two analyses. The phylogenetic positions of several tribes and subtribes, such as Epipogiinae, Gastrodieae, Nerviliinae, and Tropidieae, are well resolved in mtCDS tree. Thaieae have a different position among higher Epidendroideae, instead of sister to the higher Epidendroideae. Interrelationships of several recently radiated tribes within Epidendroideae, including Vandeae, Collabieae, Cymbidieae, Epidendreae, Podochileae, and Vandeae, have good support in the ptCDS tree, but most are not resolved in the mtCDS tree. Conflicts between the two datasets may be attributed to the different substitution rates in these two genomes and heterogeneity of substitution rate of plastome. Molecular dating indicated that the first three subfamilies, Apostasioideae, Cypripedioideae and Vanilloideae, diverged relatively quickly, and then there was a longer period before the last two subfamilies, Orchidoideae and Epidendroideae, began to radiate. Most mycoheterotrophic clades of Orchidaceae evolved in the last 30 million years with the exception of Gastrodieae.
为了增进我们对兰科植物亲缘关系和分化时间的了解,我们利用了来自 74 种兰科植物的质体基因组(ptCDS)和线粒体基因组(mtCDS)的 76 个蛋白编码基因和 38 个蛋白编码基因,对兰科植物的系统发育和时间演化进行了重建。在我们的研究结果中,基于这两个数据集构建的兰科植物系统发育树的主干得到了很好的支持,但这两个树之间存在冲突。在这两种分析中,两个亚科(Vanilloideae 和 Cypripedioideae)的系统发育位置是相反的。一些族和亚族的系统发育位置,如 Epipogiinae、Gastrodieae、Nerviliinae 和 Tropidieae,在 mtCDS 树中得到了很好的解决。Thaieae 在较高的 Epidendroideae 中处于不同的位置,而不是与较高的 Epidendroideae 姐妹关系。Epidendroideae 中几个最近辐射的族之间的相互关系,包括 Vandeae、Collabieae、Cymbidieae、Epidendreae、Podochileae 和 Vandeae,在 ptCDS 树中得到了很好的支持,但在 mtCDS 树中大多数没有得到解决。这两个数据集之间的冲突可能归因于这两个基因组中不同的替代率和质体替代率的异质性。分子定年表明,前三个亚科,Apostasioideae、Cypripedioideae 和 Vanilloideae,相对较快地分化,然后在最后两个亚科,Orchidoideae 和 Epidendroideae,开始辐射之前,又有一个较长的时期。除了 Gastrodieae 之外,兰科植物的大多数菌根异养类群是在过去 3000 万年中进化而来的。