From the Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington (JWK, KLR); Department of Preventive Medicine and Environmental Health, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington (JWK, ART); Barnstable Brown Diabetes Center, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington (HL).
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Jul-Aug;32(4):505-512. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180375.
Lifestyle change programs are an effective but underutilized approach to prevent or delay type 2 diabetes in people with prediabetes. Understanding clinician prediabetes knowledge, attitudes, and practices can inform implementation efforts to increase lifestyle change program referrals.
We surveyed clinicians at an academic family medicine clinic about their prediabetes knowledge, attitudes, and practices. From the same clinic, we reviewed electronic health records to assess prediabetes screening, diagnosis, and treatment coverage in the cohort of adults seen from 2015 to 2017.
Thirty-one clinicians (69.6%) completed the survey. Clinicians believed prediabetes was an important health issue (n = 29; 93.7%) and that prediabetes screening (n = 20, 64.5%) and diagnosis (n = 31, 100%) were important for prediabetes management. About half of the respondents (n = 14; 45.2%) reported familiarity with the National Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP). Electronic chart review included 15,520 adult patients. Most of the 5360 nondiabetic patients meeting US Preventive Services Task Force diabetes screening guidelines (n = 4068; 75.9%) received a hemoglobin A1c test. Of the 1437 patients with an A1c result diagnostic of prediabetes, 729 (50.7%) had the diagnosis in their chart. Prediabetes patients receiving point-of-care A1c testing instead of laboratory testing had 4.7 increased odds (95% CI, 3.5 to 6.4) of metformin prescription. No patients were referred to a DPP.
Clinicians' positive attitudes toward prediabetes screening, moderate knowledge of prediabetes management, and low awareness of DPPs were reflected by high diabetes screening coverage, limited prediabetes diagnosis, and no DPP referrals. We will tailor our implementation strategy to overcome these prediabetes care barriers.
生活方式改变计划是预防或延缓糖尿病前期人群 2 型糖尿病的有效但未充分利用的方法。了解临床医生的糖尿病前期知识、态度和实践可以为增加生活方式改变计划转介提供信息。
我们调查了一家学术家庭医学诊所的临床医生,了解他们的糖尿病前期知识、态度和实践。从同一诊所,我们回顾了电子健康记录,以评估 2015 年至 2017 年期间就诊的成年人队列中的糖尿病前期筛查、诊断和治疗情况。
31 名临床医生(69.6%)完成了调查。临床医生认为糖尿病前期是一个重要的健康问题(n = 29;93.7%),糖尿病前期筛查(n = 20,64.5%)和诊断(n = 31,100%)对糖尿病前期管理很重要。约一半的受访者(n = 14;45.2%)熟悉国家糖尿病预防计划(DPP)。电子图表审查包括 15520 名成年患者。大多数符合美国预防服务工作组糖尿病筛查指南的 5360 名非糖尿病患者(n = 4068;75.9%)接受了血红蛋白 A1c 测试。在 1437 名 A1c 结果诊断为糖尿病前期的患者中,729 名(50.7%)的诊断记录在病历中。接受即时检测 A1c 测试而非实验室检测的糖尿病前期患者服用二甲双胍的可能性增加了 4.7 倍(95%CI,3.5 至 6.4)。没有患者被转介到 DPP。
临床医生对糖尿病前期筛查的积极态度、对糖尿病前期管理的中等知识水平以及对 DPP 的低认识,反映在高糖尿病筛查覆盖率、有限的糖尿病前期诊断和没有 DPP 转介方面。我们将调整我们的实施策略,以克服这些糖尿病前期护理障碍。