Suppr超能文献

评估欧洲卫生技术评估网络的七份报告中的伦理分析。

Evaluation of Ethical Analyses in Seven Reports from the European Network for Health Technology Assessment.

机构信息

TOBB ETU Medical School, Department of History of Medicine and Ethics.

TOBB ETU Medical School, Department of Medical Pharmacology.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019;35(4):273-279. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000485. Epub 2019 Jul 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Ethics has been considered among the core domains of health technology assessment (HTA), but there are still disputes regarding ethical analysis. This study aimed to examine full final reports of the European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) in terms of their compliance with the ethical methodology and ethical perspective of the HTA Core Model®.

METHODS

The study examines seven full final HTA reports of EUnetHTA written based on the methodology proposed in the HTA Core Model®. The reports were analyzed using the following parameters: competency of the person/group who conducted ethical analysis, assessment elements, and the methodology of ethical analysis.

RESULTS

The results show that, although the HTA Core Model® helped to standardize the final reports of the assessment, there are still concerns regarding the competency of the ethical analysis team, the perspectives on the purpose of ethical analysis, data sources and viewpoints of various stakeholders, use of ethical analysis methodology, and the evaluation of the ethical appropriateness of the entire HTA process.

CONCLUSIONS

The HTA Core Model® helped to standardize the final reports on the HTA; however, not all issues with the content and outcomes were solved. The lack of expertise in ethics and insufficiency of the teams regarding ethical analysis are other existing problems. This study also demonstrated that stakeholder viewpoints in general and patient perspectives, in particular, have been overlooked in the HTA process.

摘要

目的

伦理学被认为是健康技术评估(HTA)的核心领域之一,但对于伦理分析仍存在争议。本研究旨在根据 HTA 核心模型®的伦理方法和伦理观点,检查欧洲卫生技术评估网络(EUnetHTA)的完整最终报告。

方法

本研究检查了根据 HTA 核心模型®提出的方法编写的 EUnetHTA 的七份完整最终 HTA 报告。使用以下参数分析报告:进行伦理分析的人员/小组的能力、评估要素以及伦理分析方法。

结果

结果表明,尽管 HTA 核心模型®有助于规范评估的最终报告,但仍存在对伦理分析团队能力、伦理分析目的观点、各种利益相关者的数据来源和观点、伦理分析方法的使用以及对整个 HTA 过程的伦理适当性的评估等方面的担忧。

结论

HTA 核心模型®有助于规范 HTA 的最终报告,但并未解决所有内容和结果方面的问题。伦理方面的专业知识的缺乏以及伦理分析团队的不足是其他现有的问题。本研究还表明,在 HTA 过程中普遍存在利益相关者观点,特别是患者观点被忽视的问题。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Ethical Analyses in Seven Reports from the European Network for Health Technology Assessment.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019;35(4):273-279. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000485. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
2
Steps toward improving ethical evaluation in health technology assessment: a proposed framework.
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Jun 6;17(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0118-0.
3
Health technology assessment (HTA): ethical aspects.
Med Health Care Philos. 2009 Nov;12(4):453-7. doi: 10.1007/s11019-009-9206-y. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
4
QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF ETHICS ANALYSES FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSSESSMENT.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016 Jan;32(5):362-369. doi: 10.1017/S0266462316000556. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
5
Core competencies for ethics experts in health technology assessment.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Dec;36(6):534-539. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320001968. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
6
Barriers and facilitators influencing ethical evaluation in health technology assessment.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015 Jan;31(3):113-23. doi: 10.1017/S026646231500032X.
7
Ethical analysis in HTA of complex health interventions.
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Mar 22;17:16. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0099-z.
9
The role of ethical analysis in conducting a health technology assessment of medical treatments for gender dysphoria.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2022 Nov 14;38(1):e82. doi: 10.1017/S0266462322003257.
10
Toward a procedure for integrating moral issues in health technology assessment.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005 Summer;21(3):312-8. doi: 10.1017/s0266462305050415.

引用本文的文献

1
[Not Available].
J Prev Med Hyg. 2024 Jun 30;65(2 Suppl 1):E1-E159. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2024.65.2s1. eCollection 2024 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
ETHICS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(5):447-457. doi: 10.1017/S0266462318000508. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
3
Ethical analysis in HTA of complex health interventions.
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Mar 22;17:16. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0099-z.
4
Barriers and facilitators influencing ethical evaluation in health technology assessment.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015 Jan;31(3):113-23. doi: 10.1017/S026646231500032X.
5
Why not integrate ethics in HTA: identification and assessment of the reasons.
GMS Health Technol Assess. 2014 Nov 26;10:Doc04. doi: 10.3205/hta000120. eCollection 2014.
6
Methodological guidance documents for evaluation of ethical considerations in health technology assessment: a systematic review.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Apr;14(2):203-20. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.894464.
7
Improving ethics analysis in health technology assessment.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Jan;27(1):64-70. doi: 10.1017/S0266462310001303. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
8
International survey on attitudes toward ethics in health technology assessment: An exploratory study.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Jan;27(1):50-4. doi: 10.1017/S0266462310001182. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
9
Why ethics should be part of health technology assessment.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008 Fall;24(4):423-9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462308080550.
10
Ethical analysis to improve decision-making on health technologies.
Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Aug;86(8):617-23. doi: 10.2471/blt.08.051078.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验