Suppr超能文献

依帕司他治疗糖尿病周围神经病变有效性和安全性的系统评价和 Meta 分析

Effect of Filgotinib vs Placebo on Clinical Response in Patients With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Refractory to Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Therapy: The FINCH 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.

出版信息

JAMA. 2019 Jul 23;322(4):315-325. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.9055.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite treatment with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) therapy need treatment options.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of filgotinib vs placebo on the signs and symptoms of RA in a treatment-refractory population.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A 24-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, multinational phase 3 trial conducted from July 2016 to June 2018 at 114 sites internationally, randomizing 449 adult patients (and treating 448) with moderately to severely active RA and inadequate response/intolerance to 1 or more prior bDMARDs.

INTERVENTIONS

Filgotinib, 200 mg (n = 148); filgotinib, 100 mg (n = 153); or placebo (n = 148) once daily; patients continued concomitant stable conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was the proportion of patients who achieved 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at week 12. Secondary outcomes included week 12 assessments of low disease activity (disease activity score in 28 joints-C-reactive protein [DAS28-CRP] ≤3.2) and change in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Physical Component, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scores, as well as week 24 assessment of remission (DAS28-CRP <2.6) and adverse events.

RESULTS

Among 448 patients who were treated (mean [SD] age, 56 [12] years; 360 women [80.4%]; mean [SD] DAS28-CRP score, 5.9 [0.96]; 105 [23.4%] with ≥3 prior bDMARDs), 381 (85%) completed the study. At week 12, more patients receiving filgotinib, 200 mg (66.0%) or 100 mg (57.5%), achieved ACR20 response (placebo, 31.1%; difference vs placebo: 34.9% [95% CI, 23.5%-46.3%] and 26.4% [95% CI, 15.0%-37.9%], respectively; both P < .001), including among patients with prior exposure to 3 or more bDMARDs (70.3%, 58.8%, and 17.6%, respectively; difference vs placebo: 52.6% [95% CI, 30.3%-75.0%] for filgotinib, 200 mg, and 41.2% [95% CI, 17.3%-65.0%] for filgotinib, 100 mg; both P < .001). The most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis (10.2%) for filgotinib, 200 mg; headache, nasopharyngitis, and upper respiratory infection (5.9% each) for filgotinib, 100 mg; and RA (6.1%) for placebo. Four uncomplicated herpes zoster cases and 1 retinal vein occlusion were reported with filgotinib; there were no opportunistic infections, active tuberculosis, malignancies, gastrointestinal perforations, or deaths.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with active RA who had an inadequate response or intolerance to 1 or more bDMARDs, filgotinib, 100 mg daily or 200 mg daily, compared with placebo resulted in a significantly greater proportion achieving a clinical response at week 12. However, further research is needed to assess longer-term efficacy and safety.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02873936.

摘要

重要性:尽管接受了生物 DMARD 治疗,但仍有活动期类风湿关节炎(RA)患者需要治疗选择。

目的:评估 filgotinib 相对于安慰剂对治疗抵抗人群 RA 体征和症状的影响。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项为期 24 周、随机、安慰剂对照、多中心的 3 期临床试验,于 2016 年 7 月至 2018 年 6 月在国际上 114 个地点进行,共纳入 449 名中度至重度活动期、对 1 种或多种既往生物 DMARD 反应不佳/不耐受的成年患者(并治疗 448 名患者)。

干预措施:每天一次给予 filgotinib 200 mg(n=148);filgotinib 100 mg(n=153);或安慰剂(n=148);患者继续同时使用稳定的常规合成 DMARD(csDMARDs)。

主要结局和测量指标:主要终点是在第 12 周时达到美国风湿病学会标准(ACR20)改善 20%的患者比例。次要结局包括第 12 周时疾病活动度低(28 个关节的 C 反应蛋白[DAS28-CRP]≤3.2)和健康评估问卷残疾指数、36 项简明健康调查问卷身体成分、慢性疾病治疗疲劳量表的变化,以及第 24 周时的缓解评估(DAS28-CRP<2.6)和不良事件。

结果:在 448 名接受治疗的患者中(平均[标准差]年龄,56[12]岁;360 名女性[80.4%];平均[标准差]DAS28-CRP 评分,5.9[0.96];105 名[23.4%]患者有≥3 种既往生物 DMARD),381 名(85%)患者完成了研究。在第 12 周时,更多接受 filgotinib 200 mg(66.0%)或 100 mg(57.5%)治疗的患者达到 ACR20 缓解(安慰剂组为 31.1%;与安慰剂相比,差异为 34.9%[95%CI,23.5%-46.3%]和 26.4%[95%CI,15.0%-37.9%];均 P<.001),包括有既往使用≥3 种生物 DMARD 暴露史的患者(分别为 70.3%、58.8%和 17.6%;与安慰剂相比,差异分别为 52.6%[95%CI,30.3%-75.0%]和 41.2%[95%CI,17.3%-65.0%];均 P<.001)。最常见的不良事件是 filgotinib 200 mg 组的鼻咽炎(10.2%);filgotinib 100 mg 组的头痛、鼻咽炎和上呼吸道感染(各 5.9%);安慰剂组的 RA(6.1%)。有 4 例单纯疱疹 zoster 病例和 1 例视网膜静脉阻塞与 filgotinib 有关;无机会性感染、活动性结核、恶性肿瘤、胃肠道穿孔或死亡。

结论和相关性:在对 1 种或多种生物 DMARD 反应不佳/不耐受的活动期 RA 患者中,与安慰剂相比,每日 100 mg 或 200 mg 的 filgotinib 治疗使更多患者在第 12 周达到临床缓解。然而,需要进一步研究来评估其长期疗效和安全性。

试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02873936。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Evolving strategies in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a historical perspective.
Reumatologia. 2025 Feb 10;63(2):116-130. doi: 10.5114/reum/195012. eCollection 2025.
4
Impact of Biological Therapies on Quality of Life in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Narrative Review.
Open Access Rheumatol. 2025 Apr 23;17:73-86. doi: 10.2147/OARRR.S523778. eCollection 2025.
5
Interindividual variability and its impact on the effectiveness of Janus kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis treatment.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 28;12:1512501. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1512501. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

2
Immunogenicity and loss of response to TNF inhibitors: implications for rheumatoid arthritis treatment.
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017 Nov 21;13(12):707-718. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2017.187.
6
Baricitinib in Patients with Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis.
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 31;374(13):1243-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507247.
7
2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Jan;68(1):1-25. doi: 10.1002/acr.22783. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
9
Preclinical characterization of GLPG0634, a selective inhibitor of JAK1, for the treatment of inflammatory diseases.
J Immunol. 2013 Oct 1;191(7):3568-77. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201348. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验