Suppr超能文献

海马萎缩作为早期发病的阿尔茨海默病患者的诊断生物标志物的作用有限:视觉评估与定量评估的比较。

Hippocampal atrophy has limited usefulness as a diagnostic biomarker on the early onset Alzheimer's disease patients: A comparison between visual and quantitative assessment.

机构信息

Alzheimer's disease and other cognitive disorders Unit, Neurology department, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.

Imaging Diagnostic Center, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain; Magnetic Resonance Image Core Facility, IDIBAPS, Spain.

出版信息

Neuroimage Clin. 2019;23:101927. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101927. Epub 2019 Jul 5.

Abstract

NIA-AA diagnostic criteria include volumetric or visual rating measures of hippocampal atrophy (HA) as a diagnostic biomarker of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We aimed to determine its utility as a diagnostic biomarker for early onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) by assessing Medial Temporal Atrophy (MTA) and hippocampal volume (HV) determination. MTA score and HV quantified by FreeSurfer were assessed in 140 (aged ≤65) subjects with biomarker supported diagnosis: 38 amnesic (A-EOAD), 20 non-amnesic (NA-EOAD), 30 late onset AD (LOAD), 20 fronto-temporal dementia (FTD) and 32 healthy controls (HC). The results showed that the proportion of MTA ≥ 1.5 was higher on LOAD and FTD than EOAD and HC but none of the MTA thresholds (≥1, ≥1.5 and ≥ 2) showed acceptable diagnostic accuracy. LOAD had lower HV than the other groups. A-EOAD HV was lower than NA-EOAD and HC but equal to FTD. The 6258 mm3 cut-off showed good diagnostic accuracy between A-EOAD and HC. Both tools showed a moderate inverse correlation. In conclusion, MTA has a limited diagnostic utility as an EOAD biomarker as it does not discriminate AD from FTD or HC in initial symptomatic stages. HV may discriminate A-EOAD from HC but not from FTD.

摘要

NIA-AA 诊断标准包括海马萎缩 (HA) 的容积或视觉评分测量,作为阿尔茨海默病 (AD) 的诊断生物标志物。我们旨在通过评估内侧颞叶萎缩 (MTA) 和海马体积 (HV) 来确定其作为早发性阿尔茨海默病 (EOAD) 的诊断生物标志物的效用。通过 FreeSurfer 评估了 140 名(年龄≤65 岁)具有生物标志物支持诊断的患者的 MTA 评分和 HV:38 名遗忘型 (A-EOAD)、20 名非遗忘型 (NA-EOAD)、30 名晚发性 AD (LOAD)、20 名额颞叶痴呆 (FTD) 和 32 名健康对照 (HC)。结果表明,LOAD 和 FTD 的 MTA≥1.5 的比例高于 EOAD 和 HC,但没有任何 MTA 阈值(≥1、≥1.5 和≥2)显示出可接受的诊断准确性。LOAD 的 HV 低于其他组。A-EOAD 的 HV 低于 NA-EOAD 和 HC,但与 FTD 相等。6258mm3 截止值在 A-EOAD 和 HC 之间显示出良好的诊断准确性。两种工具均显示出中度负相关。总之,MTA 作为 EOAD 生物标志物的诊断效用有限,因为它不能在初始症状阶段将 AD 与 FTD 或 HC 区分开来。HV 可能将 A-EOAD 与 HC 区分开来,但不能与 FTD 区分开来。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2a9/6627030/eccce13ff6e2/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验