Suppr超能文献

不平等的国家健康保险福利对自付费用和获得卫生服务的财务保护的影响:来自加纳的横断面证据。

Inequalities in the benefits of national health insurance on financial protection from out-of-pocket payments and access to health services: cross-sectional evidence from Ghana.

机构信息

Department of Social and Political Science, Bocconi University, Via Roentgen 1, Milan, Italy.

Canadian Centre for Health Economics, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2019 Nov 1;34(9):694-705. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz093.

Abstract

A central pillar of universal health coverage (UHC) is to achieve financial protection from catastrophic health expenditure. There are concerns, however, that national health insurance programmes with premiums may not benefit impoverished groups. In 2003, Ghana became the first sub-Saharan African country to introduce a National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) with progressively structured premium charges. In this study, we test the impact of being insured on utilization and financial risk protection compared with no enrolment, using the 2012-13 Ghana Living Standards Survey (n = 72 372). Consistent with previous studies, we observed that participating in health insurance significantly decreased the probability of unmet medical needs by 15 percentage points (p.p.) and that of incurring catastrophic out-of-pocket (OOP) health payments by 7 p.p. relative to no enrolment in the NHIS. Households living outside a 1-h radius to the nearest hospital had lower reductions in financial risk from excess OOP medical spending relative to households living closer (-5 p.p. vs -9 p.p.). We also find evidence that in Ghana, the scheme was highly pro-poor. Once insured, the poorest 40% of households experienced significantly larger improvements in medical utilization (18 p.p. vs. 8 p.p.) and substantively larger reductions in catastrophic OOP health expenditure (-10 p.p. vs. -6 p.p.) compared with that of the richest households. However, health insurance did not benefit vulnerable persons equally from financial risk. Once insured, poor, low-educated and self-employed households living far from hospitals had significantly lower reductions in catastrophic OOP medical spending compared with their counterparts living closer. Taken together, we show that enrolment in the NHIS is associated with improved financial protection but less so among geographically remote vulnerable groups. Efforts to boost not just insurance uptake but also health service delivery may be needed as a supplement for insurance schemes to accelerate progress towards UHC.

摘要

全民健康覆盖的一个核心支柱是实现对灾难性卫生支出的财务保护。然而,有人担心,有保费的国家健康保险计划可能对贫困群体没有好处。2003 年,加纳成为撒哈拉以南非洲第一个引入具有渐进式保费结构的国家健康保险计划(NHIS)的国家。在这项研究中,我们使用 2012-13 年加纳生活水平调查(n=72372)的数据,检验了与没有参保相比,参保对利用和财务风险保护的影响。与之前的研究一致,我们发现,与没有参加 NHIS 相比,参加健康保险可使未满足的医疗需求的概率显著降低 15 个百分点(p.p.),并使灾难性自付(OOP)健康支出的概率降低 7 个百分点。与居住在离最近医院 1 小时半径内的家庭相比,居住在较远地区的家庭的 OOP 医疗支出过高带来的财务风险降低幅度较小(-5 p.p. vs -9 p.p.)。我们还发现,在加纳,该计划对贫困人口非常有利。一旦参保,最贫穷的 40%的家庭在医疗利用方面的改善幅度显著更大(18 p.p. 与 8 p.p.),灾难性 OOP 健康支出的实质性降低幅度更大(-10 p.p. 与-6 p.p.),与最富裕家庭相比。然而,健康保险并不能使弱势群体在财务风险方面平等受益。一旦参保,居住在离医院较远的贫困、受教育程度低和自营职业家庭的灾难性 OOP 医疗支出的降低幅度明显低于居住在较近地区的家庭。总的来说,我们表明,参加 NHIS 与改善财务保护有关,但在地理上偏远的弱势群体中,这种关联较小。除了提高保险覆盖率外,还需要努力提高卫生服务的提供,作为对保险计划的补充,以加速全民健康覆盖的进展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38db/6880330/ebd651637a80/czz093f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验