Suppr超能文献

替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于拟行有创治疗的韩国急性冠状动脉综合征患者的临床显著出血比较:一项随机临床试验。

Clinically Significant Bleeding With Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Korean Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Intended for Invasive Management: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (D.W.P., H.P., D.Y.K., J.M.A., P.H.L., S.W.L., S.W.P., S.J.P.).

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea (O.K.).

出版信息

Circulation. 2019 Dec 3;140(23):1865-1877. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041766. Epub 2019 Sep 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Owing to the differential propensity for bleeding and ischemic events with response to antiplatelet therapy, the safety and effectiveness of potent P2Y12 inhibitor ticagrelor in East Asian populations remain uncertain.

METHODS

In this multicenter trial, 800 Korean patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndromes with or without ST elevation and intended for invasive management were randomly assigned to receive, in a 1:1 ratio, ticagrelor (180 mg loading dose, 90 mg twice daily thereafter) or clopidogrel (600 mg loading dose, 75 mg daily thereafter). The primary safety outcome was clinically significant bleeding (a composite of major bleeding or minor bleeding according to PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) criteria at 12 months.

RESULTS

At 12 months, the incidence of clinically significant bleeding was significantly higher in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group (11.7% [45/400] vs 5.3% [21/400]; hazard ratio [HR], 2.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34 to 3.79; =0.002). The incidences of major bleeding (7.5% [29/400] vs 4.1% [16/400], =0.04) and fatal bleeding (1% [4/400] vs 0%, =0.04) were also higher in the ticagrelor group. The incidence of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke was not significantly different between the ticagrelor group and the clopidogrel group (9.2% [36/400] vs 5.8% [23/400]; HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 0.96 to 2.74; =0.07). Overall safety and effectiveness findings were similar with the use of several different analytic methods and in multiple subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

In Korean acute coronary syndrome patients intended to receive early invasive management, standard-dose ticagrelor as compared with clopidogrel was associated with a higher incidence of clinically significant bleeding. The numerically higher incidence of ischemic events should be interpreted with caution, given the present trial was underpowered to draw any conclusion regarding efficacy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02094963.

摘要

背景

由于抗血小板治疗的出血和缺血事件发生倾向存在差异,强效 P2Y12 抑制剂替格瑞洛在东亚人群中的安全性和有效性仍不确定。

方法

在这项多中心试验中,800 名因急性冠状动脉综合征住院且拟行有创治疗的韩国患者,按 1:1 的比例随机分配,分别接受替格瑞洛(180 mg 负荷剂量,此后 90 mg 每日 2 次)或氯吡格雷(600 mg 负荷剂量,此后 75 mg 每日 1 次)治疗。主要安全性结局为 12 个月时根据 PLATO(血小板抑制和患者结局)标准(主要出血或轻微出血的复合终点)确定的临床显著出血。

结果

12 个月时,替格瑞洛组的临床显著出血发生率明显高于氯吡格雷组(11.7%[45/400]比 5.3%[21/400];风险比[HR],2.26;95%置信区间[CI],1.34 至 3.79;=0.002)。替格瑞洛组的主要出血发生率(7.5%[29/400]比 4.1%[16/400],=0.04)和致死性出血发生率(1%[4/400]比 0%,=0.04)也更高。替格瑞洛组心血管死亡、心肌梗死或卒中的发生率与氯吡格雷组无显著差异(9.2%[36/400]比 5.8%[23/400];HR,1.62;95%CI,0.96 至 2.74;=0.07)。使用几种不同的分析方法和多个亚组进行分析,整体安全性和有效性结果相似。

结论

在计划接受早期有创治疗的韩国急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,标准剂量替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷相比,出血发生率更高。鉴于本试验在评估疗效方面能力不足,缺血事件发生率较高的情况应谨慎解释。

临床试验注册

网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT02094963。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验