Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia; New South Wales Bushfire Risk Management Research Hub, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia.
Sydney School of Public Health, University Centre for Rural Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Environ Res. 2019 Dec;179(Pt A):108777. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108777. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
Asthma-related outcomes are regularly used by studies to investigate the association between human exposure to landscape fire smoke and health. Robust summary effect estimates are required to inform health protection policy for fire smoke exposure.
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the association between short-term exposure to landscape fire smoke (LFS) fine particulate matter (PM) and asthma-related outcomes.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. Four databases (PubMed, Medline, EMBASE and Scopus) and reference lists of recent fire smoke and health reviews were searched. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of case-crossover studies, and a previously validated quality assessment framework was used for observational studies lacking control groups. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger's Test. The trim and fill method was used when there was evidence of publication bias. Sensitivity and influence analyses were conducted on all endpoints to test the robustness of estimates. Summary estimates were obtained for hospitalisations and emergency department (ED) visits. A descriptive analysis was conducted for physician visits, medication use, and salbutamol dispensations.
From an initial 181 articles (after duplicate removal), 20 studies were included for quantitative assessment and descriptive synthesis. LFS PM levels were positively associated with asthma hospitalisations (RR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.09) and emergency department visits (RR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.04-1.09). Subgroup analyses found that females were more susceptible than males for ED visits, and that there was an increasing association by age groups for hospital admissions and ED visits. High heterogeneity between studies was observed, but results were robust to sensitivity analysis.
Females and all adults aged over 65 years appear to be the population groups most sensitive to asthma-related outcomes when exposed to LFS PM. Overall, results were higher than those obtained for a typical PM mixture.
哮喘相关结局常被研究用于调查人类暴露于景观火灾烟雾与健康之间的关系。为了为火灾烟雾暴露的健康保护政策提供信息,需要稳健的汇总效应估计。
进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以估计短期暴露于景观火灾烟雾(LFS)细颗粒物(PM)与哮喘相关结局之间的关联。
我们按照 PRISMA 指南进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。检索了四个数据库(PubMed、Medline、EMBASE 和 Scopus)和最近的火灾烟雾与健康综述的参考文献列表。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估病例交叉研究的质量,对于缺乏对照组的观察性研究,使用经过验证的质量评估框架。使用漏斗图和 Egger 检验评估发表偏倚。当存在发表偏倚的证据时,使用修剪和填充方法。对所有终点进行敏感性和影响分析,以测试估计的稳健性。对住院和急诊就诊(ED)进行汇总估计。对医生就诊、药物使用和沙丁胺醇配药进行描述性分析。
从最初的 181 篇文章(去除重复项后)中,有 20 项研究被纳入定量评估和描述性综合分析。LFS PM 水平与哮喘住院(RR=1.06,95%CI:1.02-1.09)和急诊就诊(RR=1.07,95%CI:1.04-1.09)呈正相关。亚组分析发现,女性对 ED 就诊比男性更敏感,住院和 ED 就诊的年龄组相关性呈递增趋势。研究之间存在高度异质性,但敏感性分析结果稳健。
暴露于 LFS PM 时,女性和所有 65 岁以上的成年人似乎是哮喘相关结局最敏感的人群。总体而言,结果高于典型 PM 混合物的结果。