Suppr超能文献

术前分期的预后性能:新的临床分类与第八版美国癌症联合委员会胃癌分类的病理分类在多排 CT 评估之间。

Prognostic Performance of Preoperative Staging: Assessed by Using Multidetector Computed Tomography-Between the New Clinical Classification and the Pathological Classification in the Eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer Classification for Gastric Carcinoma.

机构信息

Gastric Cancer Clinic, Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Hwasun-gun, Jeollanam-do, South Korea.

Division of Gastroenterologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Hwasun-gun, Jeollanam-do, South Korea.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Feb;27(2):545-551. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07845-3. Epub 2019 Oct 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since the eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification recently introduced the clinical classification for preoperative staging of gastric cancer, the new clinical classification has not been extensively validated yet. Therefore, in this study, we compared the prognostic performance of the new clinical classification and the pathologic classification for preoperative staging of gastric cancer.

METHODS

We reviewed 3027 patients with gastric cancer who were surgically treated between 2009 and 2013. Patient survival was analyzed according to the preoperative stage by the clinical classification and the pathologic classification in the eighth AJCC classification. The prognostic performance was examined using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) value and Harrell c-index.

RESULTS

Patient survival was significantly different across the different stages when both classifications were used. However, individual pairwise comparisons showed that survival differences between each stage were more distinctive and homogeneous in the pathologic classification. In the multivariate model adjusted for the final pathologic stage, preoperative staging by the pathologic classification was an independent prognostic factor, whereas the clinical classification was not. The pathologic classification showed a lower AIC value compared with the clinical classification (5100.64 vs. 5114.14). The Harrell c-index was higher in the pathologic classification than in the clinical classification (0.741 vs. 0.739).

CONCLUSIONS

The new clinical classification in the eighth AJCC classification discriminates patient survival well. However, it does not appear to have a better prognostic performance compared with the pathologic classification for preoperative staging of gastric cancer.

摘要

背景

自第八版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)胃癌术前分期临床分类系统发布以来,新的临床分类尚未得到广泛验证。因此,本研究旨在比较新的临床分类与胃癌术前分期的病理分类对患者预后的预测效能。

方法

我们回顾了 2009 年至 2013 年间接受手术治疗的 3027 例胃癌患者的临床资料。根据第八版 AJCC 分期中的临床分类和病理分类对患者术前分期进行分析,评估患者的生存情况。采用赤池信息量准则(AIC)值和 Harrell c 指数评估两种分类方法的预后预测效能。

结果

两种分类方法均显示不同分期患者的生存情况存在显著差异。然而,两两比较显示,病理分类中各期之间的生存差异更具特征性和一致性。在多因素模型中,最终病理分期是独立的预后因素,而临床分期则不是。与临床分类相比,病理分类的 AIC 值更小(5100.64 比 5114.14)。病理分类的 Harrell c 指数也高于临床分类(0.741 比 0.739)。

结论

第八版 AJCC 胃癌术前分期的临床分类能较好地区分患者的生存情况,但与病理分类相比,其预后预测效能似乎并无优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验