Center on Mindfulness and Integrative Health Intervention Development, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
College of Social Work, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jan 1;180(1):91-105. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4917.
Mind-body therapies (MBTs) are emerging as potential tools for addressing the opioid crisis. Knowing whether mind-body therapies may benefit patients treated with opioids for acute, procedural, and chronic pain conditions may be useful for prescribers, payers, policy makers, and patients.
To evaluate the association of MBTs with pain and opioid dose reduction in a diverse adult population with clinical pain.
For this systematic review and meta-analysis, the MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for English-language randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews from date of inception to March 2018. Search logic included (pain OR analgesia OR opioids) AND mind-body therapies. The gray literature, ClinicalTrials.gov, and relevant bibliographies were also searched.
Randomized clinical trials that evaluated the use of MBTs for symptom management in adults also prescribed opioids for clinical pain.
Independent reviewers screened citations, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analyses were conducted using standardized mean differences in pain and opioid dose to obtain aggregate estimates of effect size with 95% CIs.
The primary outcome was pain intensity. The secondary outcomes were opioid dose, opioid misuse, opioid craving, disability, or function.
Of 4212 citations reviewed, 60 reports with 6404 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, MBTs were associated with pain reduction (Cohen d = -0.51; 95% CI, -0.76 to -0.26) and reduced opioid dose (Cohen d = -0.26; 95% CI, -0.44 to -0.08). Studies tested meditation (n = 5), hypnosis (n = 25), relaxation (n = 14), guided imagery (n = 7), therapeutic suggestion (n = 6), and cognitive behavioral therapy (n = 7) interventions. Moderate to large effect size improvements in pain outcomes were found for meditation (Cohen d = -0.70), hypnosis (Cohen d = -0.54), suggestion (Cohen d = -0.68), and cognitive behavioral therapy (Cohen d = -0.43) but not for other MBTs. Although most meditation (n = 4 [80%]), cognitive-behavioral therapy (n = 4 [57%]), and hypnosis (n = 12 [63%]) studies found improved opioid-related outcomes, fewer studies of suggestion, guided imagery, and relaxation reported such improvements. Most MBT studies used active or placebo controls and were judged to be at low risk of bias.
The findings suggest that MBTs are associated with moderate improvements in pain and small reductions in opioid dose and may be associated with therapeutic benefits for opioid-related problems, such as opioid craving and misuse. Future studies should carefully quantify opioid dosing variables to determine the association of mind-body therapies with opioid-related outcomes.
身心疗法(MBTs)正在成为解决阿片类药物危机的潜在工具。了解身心疗法是否可能使接受阿片类药物治疗急性、程序和慢性疼痛的患者受益,对于处方者、付款人、政策制定者和患者可能是有用的。
评估在有临床疼痛的不同成年人群中,MBTs 与疼痛和阿片类药物剂量减少的关联。
对于这项系统评价和荟萃分析,从成立之日起至 2018 年 3 月,检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、Emcare、CINAHL、PsycINFO 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库的英文随机临床试验和系统评价。搜索逻辑包括(疼痛或镇痛或阿片类药物)和身心疗法。还检索了灰色文献、ClinicalTrials.gov 和相关参考文献。
评估 MBT 用于管理成人症状的同时也为临床疼痛开具阿片类药物的随机临床试验。
独立审查员筛选引用文献、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。使用标准化均数差值进行疼痛和阿片类药物剂量的荟萃分析,以获得效应大小的综合估计值和 95%置信区间。
主要结局是疼痛强度。次要结局是阿片类药物剂量、阿片类药物滥用、阿片类药物渴求、残疾或功能。
在审查的 4212 篇引文中有 60 篇报告中有 6404 名参与者纳入荟萃分析。总体而言,MBTs 与疼痛减轻(Cohen d = -0.51;95%CI,-0.76 至 -0.26)和阿片类药物剂量减少(Cohen d = -0.26;95%CI,-0.44 至 -0.08)有关。研究测试了冥想(n = 5)、催眠(n = 25)、放松(n = 14)、引导意象(n = 7)、治疗性建议(n = 6)和认知行为疗法(n = 7)干预措施。冥想(Cohen d = -0.70)、催眠(Cohen d = -0.54)、建议(Cohen d = -0.68)和认知行为疗法(Cohen d = -0.43)的疼痛结局有中度至较大的改善效果,但其他 MBT 则没有。虽然大多数冥想(n = 4 [80%])、认知行为疗法(n = 4 [57%])和催眠(n = 12 [63%])研究发现改善了与阿片类药物相关的结果,但较少的建议、引导意象和放松研究报告了此类改善。大多数 MBT 研究使用了活性或安慰剂对照,并被认为偏倚风险较低。
研究结果表明,MBTs 与疼痛的中度改善和阿片类药物剂量的小幅减少有关,并且可能与阿片类药物相关问题(如阿片类药物渴求或滥用)的治疗益处有关。未来的研究应仔细量化阿片类药物剂量变量,以确定身心疗法与阿片类药物相关结果的关联。