Dept of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, School of Health & Life Sciences, Northumbria University Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Dept of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, School of Health & Life Sciences, Northumbria University Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Eur Respir Rev. 2019 Nov 13;28(154). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0039-2019. Print 2019 Dec 31.
The aim of this study was to examine the use of pedometers as a tool to promote daily physical activity levels in patients with COPD.A systematic review meta-analysis of pedometer physical activity promotion in patients with COPD was conducted. Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and CINAHL were searched from inception to January 2019. The search strategy included the following keywords: physical activity promotion, pulmonary rehabilitation and daily physical activity. The eligibility criteria for selecting studies were randomised controlled trials reporting pedometer physical activity promotion in patients with COPD.Improvements in steps per day were found with pedometer physical activity promotion either standalone (n=12, mean 0.53 (95% CI 0.29-0.77); p=0.00001) or alongside pulmonary rehabilitation (n=7, 0.51 (0.13-0.88); p=0.006). A subgroup analysis reported significant differences in the promotion of physical activity based on baseline physical activity levels and the type of instrument used to assess levels of physical activity.Future trials should consider the way in which pedometers are used to promote physical activity to inform clinical practice in the setting of pulmonary rehabilitation.
本研究旨在探讨计步器作为促进 COPD 患者日常体力活动水平的工具的使用情况。对 COPD 患者计步器体力活动促进作用进行了系统评价荟萃分析。从建库到 2019 年 1 月,检索了 Medline/PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science 和 CINAHL。搜索策略包括以下关键词:体力活动促进、肺康复和日常体力活动。选择研究的纳入标准为报告 COPD 患者计步器体力活动促进的随机对照试验。单独使用计步器进行体力活动促进(n=12,平均每天增加 0.53 步(95%CI 0.29-0.77);p=0.00001)或与肺康复一起使用(n=7,0.51(0.13-0.88);p=0.006)均可改善每天的步数。亚组分析报告称,根据基线体力活动水平和用于评估体力活动水平的仪器类型,体力活动促进方面存在显著差异。未来的试验应考虑使用计步器促进体力活动的方式,为肺康复环境中的临床实践提供信息。