Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, California.
Hippocampus. 2020 Apr;30(4):422-432. doi: 10.1002/hipo.23175. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
Grid cells provide a compelling example of a link between cellular activity and an abstract and difficult to define concept like space. Accordingly, a representational perspective on grid coding argues that neural grid coding underlies a fundamentally spatial metric. Recently, some theoretical proposals have suggested extending such a framework to nonspatial cognition as well, such as category learning. Here, we provide a critique of the frequently employed assumption of an isomorphism between patterns of neural activity (e.g., grid cells), mental representation, and behavior (e.g., navigation). Specifically, we question the strict isomorphism between these three levels and suggest that human spatial navigation is perhaps best characterized by a wide variety of both metric and nonmetric strategies. We offer an alternative perspective on how grid coding might relate to human spatial navigation, arguing that grid coding is part of a much larger conglomeration of neural activity patterns that dynamically tune to accomplish specific behavioral outputs.
网格细胞为细胞活动与空间等抽象且难以定义的概念之间的联系提供了一个引人注目的例子。因此,网格编码的表现观点认为,神经网格编码是基本空间度量的基础。最近,一些理论建议将这样的框架扩展到非空间认知,例如类别学习。在这里,我们对经常采用的假设提出批评,即神经活动模式(例如网格细胞)、心理表征和行为(例如导航)之间存在同构关系。具体来说,我们质疑这三个层次之间的严格同构性,并认为人类空间导航可能最好用各种度量和非度量策略来描述。我们提供了一个关于网格编码如何与人类空间导航相关的替代视角,认为网格编码是动态调整以完成特定行为输出的大量神经活动模式的一部分。