Institut de la Màcula and Barcelona Macula Foundation, Barcelona, Spain,
Center for Ophthalmic Bioinformatics, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Ophthalmologica. 2020;243(1):1-8. doi: 10.1159/000502747. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
To assess the gap between visual acuity (VA) outcomes with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapies in clinical trials and real-world practice, and explore the reasons for this gap.
The literature was searched from January 1, 2013, to June 30, 2018, for studies reporting VA gains and injection frequencies in clinical trials and real-world practice.
Clinical trials of anti-VEGF agents and their extension studies demonstrated initial VA gains maintained at 4 years and beyond (up to 7 years) with continuous proactive treatment. Visual outcomes correlated with injection frequency. In real-world practice, patients are usually undertreated, accounting for the VA decline over time. Reasons for undertreatment include the burden of injections and monitoring visits imposed on patients/caregivers. However, another primary reason is the general mindset in the ophthalmological community that sustained benefits with treatment are not possible, leading to poor compliance and creating a vicious circle.
Initial VA gains can be maintained with more intensive/proactive approaches. Promising new treatments requiring less frequent injections/monitoring will help in the near future; meanwhile, better results could be achieved by changing the community mindset that contributes to undertreatment.
评估抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)疗法在临床试验和真实世界实践中的视力(VA)结果差距,并探讨造成这种差距的原因。
从 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 6 月 30 日,检索了报告临床试验和真实世界实践中 VA 增益和注射频率的研究文献。
抗 VEGF 药物的临床试验及其扩展研究表明,持续积极治疗可维持最初的 VA 增益长达 4 年及以上(长达 7 年)。视力结果与注射频率相关。在真实世界实践中,患者通常治疗不足,导致 VA 随时间下降。治疗不足的原因包括注射和监测就诊给患者/护理人员带来的负担。然而,另一个主要原因是眼科界普遍认为持续治疗不可能带来持续的获益,导致治疗依从性差,形成恶性循环。
更密集/积极的方法可维持初始 VA 增益。不久的将来,需要较少注射/监测的有前途的新治疗方法将有所帮助;同时,通过改变导致治疗不足的社区思维模式,可以获得更好的结果。