Suppr超能文献

脉冲与连续治疗甲真菌病(趾甲真菌感染)的疗效和安全性。

The efficacy and safety of pulse vs. continuous therapy for dermatophyte toenail onychomycosis.

机构信息

Mediprobe Research Inc., London, ON, Canada.

Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto School of Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Mar;34(3):580-588. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16101. Epub 2019 Dec 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Onychomycosis is a chronic, fungal infection of the nails. Complete cure remains challenging, but oral antifungal medications have been successful in managing the fungus for a significant proportion of patients. Treatment with these drugs can be continuous or intermittent, albeit the evidence on their relative efficacies remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relative effectiveness and safety of pulse versus continuous administration, of three common oral therapies for dermatophyte onychomycosis, by conducting multiple-treatment meta-analysis.

METHODS

This systematic review and network meta-analysis compared the efficacy (as per mycological cure) and adverse event rates of three oral antifungal medications in the treatment of dermatophyte toenail onychomycosis, namely terbinafine, itraconazole and fluconazole. A total of 30 studies were included in the systematic review, while 22 were included in the network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The likelihood of mycological cure was not significantly different between continuous and pulse regimens for each of terbinafine and itraconazole. Use of continuous terbinafine for 24 weeks - but not 12 weeks - was significantly more likely to result in mycological cure than continuous itraconazole for 12 weeks or weekly fluconazole for 9-12 months. Rank probabilities demonstrated that 24-week continuous treatment of terbinafine was the most effective. There were no significant differences in the likelihood of adverse events between any continuous and pulse regimens of terbinafine, itraconazole and fluconazole. Drug treatments were similar to placebo in terms of their likelihood of producing adverse events.

CONCLUSION

More knowledge about the fungal life cycle and drugs' pharmacokinetics in nail and plasma could further explain the relative efficacy and safety of the pulse and continuous treatment regimens. Our results indicate that in the treatment of dermatophyte toenail onychomycosis, the continuous and pulse regimens for terbinafine and itraconazole have similar efficacies and rates of adverse events.

摘要

背景

甲真菌病是一种慢性真菌感染。虽然口服抗真菌药物在很大一部分患者中成功地控制了真菌,但完全治愈仍然具有挑战性。这些药物可以连续或间歇性使用,尽管关于它们相对疗效的证据仍不清楚。

目的

通过进行多治疗荟萃分析,确定三种常见的口服抗真菌药物治疗皮肤真菌性甲真菌病的脉冲与连续给药的相对有效性和安全性。

方法

这项系统评价和网络荟萃分析比较了三种口服抗真菌药物(特比萘芬、伊曲康唑和氟康唑)治疗皮肤真菌性趾甲甲真菌病的疗效(按真菌学治愈)和不良反应发生率。系统评价共纳入 30 项研究,网络荟萃分析共纳入 22 项研究。

结果

对于特比萘芬和伊曲康唑,连续和脉冲方案的真菌学治愈率没有显著差异。连续使用特比萘芬 24 周(而不是 12 周)比连续使用伊曲康唑 12 周或每周使用氟康唑 9-12 个月更有可能实现真菌学治愈。等级概率表明,24 周连续治疗特比萘芬是最有效的。特比萘芬、伊曲康唑和氟康唑的连续和脉冲方案之间的不良反应发生率没有显著差异。药物治疗与安慰剂相比,产生不良反应的可能性相似。

结论

更多关于真菌生命周期和药物在指甲和血浆中的药代动力学的知识可以进一步解释脉冲和连续治疗方案的相对疗效和安全性。我们的结果表明,在治疗皮肤真菌性趾甲甲真菌病时,特比萘芬和伊曲康唑的连续和脉冲方案具有相似的疗效和不良反应发生率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验