Suppr超能文献

免疫疗法在任何治疗线均可改善晚期转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的生存,优于化疗(Quijote-CLICaP)。

Immunotherapy at any line of treatment improves survival in patients with advanced metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with chemotherapy (Quijote-CLICaP).

机构信息

Foundation for Clinical and Applied Cancer Research (FICMAC), Bogotá, Colombia.

Molecular Oncology and Biology Systems Research Group (FOX-G), Universidad el Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.

出版信息

Thorac Cancer. 2020 Feb;11(2):353-361. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13272. Epub 2019 Dec 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare survival outcomes of patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received immunotherapy as first-, second- or beyond line, versus matched patients receiving standard chemotherapy with special characterization of hyperprogressors.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 296 patients with unresectable/metastatic NSCLC treated with either, first-, second-, third- or fourth-line of immunotherapy was conducted. A matched comparison with a historical cohort of first-line chemotherapy and a random forest tree analysis to characterize hyperprogressors was conducted.

RESULTS

Median age was 64 years (range 34-90), 40.2% of patients were female. A total of 91.2% of patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score ≤ 1. Immunotherapy as first-line was given to 39 patients (13.7%), second-line to 140 (48.8%), and as third-line and beyond to 108 (37.6%). Median overall survival was 12.7 months (95% CI 9.67-14 months) and progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.27 months (95% CI 3.97-5.0). Factors associated with increased survival included treatment with immunotherapy as first-line (P < 0.001), type of response (P < 0.001) and PD-L1 status (P = 0.0039). Compared with the historical cohort, immunotherapy proved to be superior in terms of OS (P = 0.05) but not PFS (P = 0.2). A total of 44 hyperprogressors were documented (19.8%, [95% CI 14.5-25.1%]). Leukocyte count over 5.300 cells/dL was present in both hyperprogressors and long-term responders.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who receive immune-checkpoint inhibitors as part of their treatment for NSCLC have better overall survival (OS) compared with matched patients treated with standard chemotherapy, regardless of the line of treatment.

摘要

背景

比较接受免疫治疗的晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的生存结果,这些患者接受免疫治疗作为一线、二线或以上治疗,与接受标准化疗的匹配患者相比,特别描述了超进展者。

方法

对 296 名接受免疫治疗的不可切除/转移性 NSCLC 患者进行了回顾性队列研究,这些患者接受了一线、二线、三线或四线免疫治疗。与一线化疗的历史队列进行匹配比较,并进行随机森林树分析以描述超进展者。

结果

中位年龄为 64 岁(范围 34-90),40.2%的患者为女性。共有 91.2%的患者的东部合作肿瘤学组(ECOG)表现评分≤1。一线免疫治疗给予 39 例(13.7%),二线治疗给予 140 例(48.8%),三线及以上治疗给予 108 例(37.6%)。中位总生存期为 12.7 个月(95%CI 9.67-14 个月),无进展生存期(PFS)为 4.27 个月(95%CI 3.97-5.0)。与生存增加相关的因素包括一线接受免疫治疗(P<0.001)、反应类型(P<0.001)和 PD-L1 状态(P=0.0039)。与历史队列相比,免疫治疗在 OS 方面表现出优越性(P=0.05),但在 PFS 方面没有优势(P=0.2)。共记录了 44 例超进展者(19.8%,[95%CI 14.5-25.1%])。白细胞计数超过 5300 个/μL 在超进展者和长期反应者中均存在。

结论

接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的 NSCLC 患者的总生存(OS)优于接受标准化疗的匹配患者,无论治疗线如何。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db9d/6996989/c198f2c9d25d/TCA-11-353-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验