Endocrinology and Nutrition Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain.
Diabetes Care. 2020 Feb;43(2):337-342. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0739. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
To assess the impact of a telemedicine visit using the platform Diabetic compared with a face-to-face visit on clinical outcomes, patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and physicians' satisfaction in patients with type 1 diabetes.
PLATEDIAN (Telemedicine on Metabolic Control in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Andalusian Patients) (NCT03332472) was a multicenter, randomized, 6-month follow-up, open-label, parallel-group controlled study performed in patients with type 1 diabetes with suboptimal metabolic control (HbA <8% [<64 mmol/mol]), treated with multiple daily injections. A total of 388 patients were assessed for eligibility; 379 of them were randomized 1:1 to three face-to-face visits (control cohort [CC]) ( = 167) or the replacement of an intermediate face-to-face visit by a telemedicine visit using Diabetic (intervention cohort [IC]) ( = 163). The primary efficacy end point was the mean change of HbA levels from baseline to month 6. Other efficacy and safety end points were mean blood glucose, glucose variability, episodes of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, patient-reported outcomes, and physicians' satisfaction.
At month 6, the mean change in HbA levels was -0.04 ± 0.5% (-0.5 ± 5.8 mmol/mol) in the CC and 0.01 ± 0.6% (0.1 ± 6.0 mmol/mol) in the IC ( = 0.4941). The number of patients who achieved HbA <7% (<53 mmol/mol) was 73 and 78 in the CC and IC, respectively. Significant differences were not found regarding safety end points at 6 months. Changes in HRQoL between the first visit and final visit did not differ between cohorts, and, regarding fear of hypoglycemia (FH-15 score ≥28), statistically significant differences observed at baseline remained unchanged at 6 months ( < 0.05).
The use of telemedicine in patients with type 1 diabetes with HbA <8% (<64 mmol/mol) provides similar efficacy and safety outcomes as face-to-face visits.
评估使用平台 Diabetic 进行远程医疗访问与面对面访问相比对 1 型糖尿病患者的临床结局、患者健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)和医生满意度的影响。
PLATEDIAN(1 型糖尿病患者代谢控制的远程医疗)(NCT03332472)是一项多中心、随机、6 个月随访、开放标签、平行组对照研究,纳入了代谢控制不佳(HbA <8% [<64 mmol/mol])的 1 型糖尿病患者,他们接受多次每日注射治疗。共有 388 名患者被评估是否符合入选标准;其中 379 名患者被随机分为 1:1 的两组,分别接受 3 次面对面访问(对照组 [CC])(=167)或使用 Diabetic 替代 1 次中间的面对面访问(干预组 [IC])(=163)。主要疗效终点为从基线到第 6 个月时 HbA 水平的平均变化。其他疗效和安全性终点为平均血糖、血糖变异性、低血糖和高血糖发作、患者报告的结果以及医生满意度。
在第 6 个月时,CC 组 HbA 水平的平均变化为-0.04 ± 0.5%(-0.5 ± 5.8 mmol/mol),IC 组为 0.01 ± 0.6%(0.1 ± 6.0 mmol/mol)(=0.4941)。CC 和 IC 组分别有 73 名和 78 名患者达到 HbA <7%(<53 mmol/mol)。6 个月时安全性终点无显著差异。在第一访视和最后访视之间,两组的 HRQoL 变化没有差异,并且在基线时观察到的低血糖恐惧(FH-15 评分≥28)方面,6 个月时仍保持不变(<0.05)。
在 HbA <8%(<64 mmol/mol)的 1 型糖尿病患者中使用远程医疗提供了与面对面访问相似的疗效和安全性结果。