Universidade Federal de Pelotas - UFPel, School of Dentistry, Department of Semiology and Clinic, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM, School of Dentistry, Department of Stomatology, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Braz Oral Res. 2019 Dec 20;33:e062. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0062. eCollection 2019.
Laboratory evidence has demonstrated the antimicrobial effect of Melaleuca alternifolia (MEL) against oral microorganisms. This randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial, compared the anti-biofilm and anti-inflammatory effects of MEL nanoparticles with 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) on biofilm-free (BF) and biofilm-covered (BC) surfaces. Before each experimental period, the participants refrained from all oral hygiene practices for 72 hours. The 60 participants were randomly assigned to professional prophylaxis in two quadrants (Q1-Q3 or Q2-Q4), and rinsed with MEL or CHX for four days. The Quigley & Hein plaque index (QHPI), gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) volume, and participants' perceptions were assessed. CHX showed significantly lower mean QHPI on BF (2.65 ± 0.34 vs. 3.34 ± 0.33, p < 0.05) and BC surfaces (2.84 ± 0.37 vs. 3.37 ± 0.33, p < 0.05). Intragroup comparisons indicated reductions in GCF in all the groups, with significant differences only for CHX on BF surfaces (p < 0.05). Intergroup comparisons revealed no significant differences (p > 0.05). Based on individual perceptions, CHX had better taste and biofilm control, but resulted in a greater change in taste. Nevertheless, MEL demonstrated anti-inflammatory effects similar to those of CHX. Further clinical trials testing different protocols, concentrations and follow-up periods are required to establish its clinical application.
实验室证据表明,互叶白千层(MEL)对口腔微生物具有抗菌作用。这项随机、双盲、交叉临床试验比较了 MEL 纳米粒子与 0.12%葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHX)对无生物膜(BF)和生物膜覆盖(BC)表面的抗生物膜和抗炎作用。在每个实验期之前,参与者在 72 小时内避免进行所有口腔卫生措施。将 60 名参与者随机分为两组(Q1-Q3 或 Q2-Q4)进行专业预防,并用 MEL 或 CHX 漱口四天。评估了 Quigley 和 Hein 菌斑指数(QHPI)、龈沟液(GCF)量和参与者的感知。CHX 在 BF(2.65 ± 0.34 对 3.34 ± 0.33,p < 0.05)和 BC 表面(2.84 ± 0.37 对 3.37 ± 0.33,p < 0.05)上的平均 QHPI 显著较低。组内比较表明所有组的 GCF 均减少,但仅在 BF 表面的 CHX 上有显著差异(p < 0.05)。组间比较无显著差异(p > 0.05)。根据个体感知,CHX 具有更好的口感和生物膜控制能力,但会导致口感变化更大。然而,MEL 表现出与 CHX 相似的抗炎作用。需要进行不同方案、浓度和随访期的进一步临床试验,以确定其临床应用。