Pain Research Group, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Statistical Advisory Service, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Scand J Pain. 2020 Jul 28;20(3):439-449. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2019-0152.
Background and aims The placebo response has been identified as one factor responsible for the lack of therapeutic trials with positive outcomes in neuropathic pain. Reviews have suggested that certain neuropathic pain conditions, including HIV-associated sensory neuropathy (HIV-SN), exhibit a greater placebo response than other neuropathic aetiologies. If true, such a finding could substantially affect clinical trial design and therapeutic developments for these conditions. This study aimed to identify any difference in placebo response between trials of systemic pharmacological intervention in HIV-SN and a comparable neuropathic condition, diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) and to identify factors influencing the placebo response. Methods A systematic review search to identify randomised, double-blind studies of systemic pharmacological interventions for painful HIV-SN and DPN published between January 1966 and June 2019 was performed. A meta-analysis of the magnitude of placebo response and the proportion of placebo responders was conducted and compared between the two disease conditions. A meta-regression was used to assess for any study and participant characteristics that were associated with the placebo response. Only studies meeting a methodological quality threshold were included. Results Seventy-five trials were identified. There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of placebo responders (HIV-SN = 0.35; versus DPN = 0.27, p = 0.129). The difference observed in the magnitude of the placebo response [pain reduction of 1.68 (1.47-1.88) DPN; 2.38 (1.87-2.98) in HIV-SN] was based on only 2 trials of HIV-SN and 35 of DPN. Potential factors influencing the placebo response such as psychological measures, were reported inconsistently. Conclusions We found no statistically significant difference in the placebo response rate between painful HIV-SN and DPN. Too few studies were available that reported the necessary information to clarify potential differences in the magnitude of placebo response or to elucidate parameters that could be contributing such differences. Implications The placebo response is one factor that may contribute to a lack of positive trials in neuropathic pain; some etiologies may display larger responses than others. This meta-analysis found no significant difference in placebo response between trials of HIV-associated sensory neuropathy and painful diabetic polyneuropathy, although limited data were available.
安慰剂效应被认为是导致神经病理性疼痛的治疗试验缺乏阳性结果的一个因素。综述表明,某些神经病理性疼痛病症,包括 HIV 相关感觉神经病(HIV-SN),比其他神经病变病因表现出更大的安慰剂反应。如果这是真的,那么这一发现可能会极大地影响这些病症的临床试验设计和治疗进展。本研究旨在确定 HIV-SN 与类似神经病变病症(糖尿病性多发性神经病[DPN])的系统性药物干预试验之间的安慰剂反应是否存在差异,并确定影响安慰剂反应的因素。
对 1966 年 1 月至 2019 年 6 月期间发表的针对疼痛性 HIV-SN 和 DPN 的系统性药物干预的随机、双盲研究进行了系统综述检索。对两种疾病状况的安慰剂反应程度和安慰剂反应者的比例进行了荟萃分析,并进行了比较。采用荟萃回归分析评估与安慰剂反应相关的任何研究和参与者特征。只有符合方法学质量标准的研究才被纳入。
共确定了 75 项试验。安慰剂反应者的比例(HIV-SN:0.35;DPN:0.27,p=0.129)无统计学差异。观察到的安慰剂反应程度的差异[疼痛减轻:DPN:1.68(1.47-1.88);HIV-SN:2.38(1.87-2.98)]仅基于 2 项 HIV-SN 研究和 35 项 DPN 研究。潜在影响安慰剂反应的因素,如心理测量,报告不一致。
我们发现,疼痛性 HIV-SN 和 DPN 的安慰剂反应率无统计学差异。可报告必要信息的研究太少,无法明确安慰剂反应程度的潜在差异,也无法阐明可能导致这些差异的参数。
安慰剂效应是导致神经病理性疼痛治疗试验缺乏阳性结果的一个因素;某些病因的反应可能比其他病因更大。本荟萃分析发现,HIV 相关感觉神经病与疼痛性糖尿病多发性神经病试验之间的安慰剂反应无显著差异,尽管可用数据有限。