State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jun;43(6):1293-1299. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1817. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
To study whether the effects of intensive glycemic control on major vascular outcomes (a composite of major macrovascular and major microvascular events), all-cause mortality, and severe hypoglycemia events differ among participants with different levels of 10-year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and hemoglobin A (HbA) at baseline.
We studied the effects of more intensive glycemic control in 11,071 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), without missing values, in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial, using Cox models.
During 5 years' follow-up, intensive glycemic control reduced major vascular events (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90 [95% CI 0.83-0.98]), with the major driver being a reduction in the development of macroalbuminuria. There was no evidence of differences in the effect, regardless of baseline ASCVD risk or HbA level ( for interaction = 0.29 and 0.94, respectively). Similarly, the beneficial effects of intensive glycemic control on all-cause mortality were not significantly different across baseline ASCVD risk ( = 0.15) or HbA levels ( = 0.87). The risks of severe hypoglycemic events were higher in the intensive glycemic control group compared with the standard glycemic control group (HR 1.85 [1.41-2.42]), with no significant heterogeneity across subgroups defined by ASCVD risk or HbA at baseline ( = 0.09 and 0.18, respectively).
The major benefits for patients with T2D in ADVANCE did not substantially differ across levels of baseline ASCVD risk and HbA.
研究强化血糖控制对主要血管结局(主要大血管和主要微血管事件的复合结局)、全因死亡率和严重低血糖事件的影响是否因基线时的 10 年动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险和血红蛋白 A(HbA)水平不同而有所差异。
我们使用 Cox 模型研究了 11071 例无缺失值的 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者在糖尿病和血管疾病行动:培哚普利与米格列醇控释片(ADVANCE)试验中强化血糖控制的效果。
在 5 年的随访期间,强化血糖控制降低了主要血管事件的发生风险(风险比[HR]0.90[95%CI 0.83-0.98]),主要驱动因素是减少了白蛋白尿的发生。无论基线 ASCVD 风险或 HbA 水平如何,强化血糖控制的效果均无差异(交互检验=0.29 和 0.94)。同样,强化血糖控制对全因死亡率的有益影响在基线 ASCVD 风险(交互检验=0.15)或 HbA 水平(交互检验=0.87)方面也没有显著差异。与标准血糖控制组相比,强化血糖控制组严重低血糖事件的风险更高(HR 1.85[1.41-2.42]),但在根据基线 ASCVD 风险或 HbA 定义的亚组之间没有显著的异质性(交互检验=0.09 和 0.18)。
在 ADVANCE 中,T2D 患者的主要获益在基线 ASCVD 风险和 HbA 水平方面没有显著差异。