Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin.
Psychol Sci. 2020 Apr;31(4):408-423. doi: 10.1177/0956797620904154. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
Considerable research has examined human mate preferences across cultures, finding universal sex differences in preferences for attractiveness and resources as well as sources of systematic cultural variation. Two competing perspectives-an evolutionary psychological perspective and a biosocial role perspective-offer alternative explanations for these findings. However, the original data on which each perspective relies are decades old, and the literature is fraught with conflicting methods, analyses, results, and conclusions. Using a new 45-country sample ( = 14,399), we attempted to replicate classic studies and test both the evolutionary and biosocial role perspectives. Support for universal sex differences in preferences remains robust: Men, more than women, prefer attractive, young mates, and women, more than men, prefer older mates with financial prospects. Cross-culturally, both sexes have mates closer to their own ages as gender equality increases. Beyond age of partner, neither pathogen prevalence nor gender equality robustly predicted sex differences or preferences across countries.
大量研究考察了跨文化背景下的人类伴侣偏好,发现对吸引力和资源的偏好以及系统的文化差异来源存在普遍的性别差异。两种相互竞争的观点——进化心理学观点和生物社会角色观点——为这些发现提供了替代解释。然而,每种观点所依赖的原始数据都已经有几十年的历史了,而且文献中充斥着相互矛盾的方法、分析、结果和结论。我们使用一个新的 45 个国家的样本(n=14399),试图复制经典研究,并同时检验进化和生物社会角色观点。对性别的普遍偏好差异的支持仍然很强烈:男性比女性更偏好有吸引力的年轻伴侣,而女性比男性更偏好有经济前景的年长伴侣。在跨文化背景下,随着性别平等的提高,两性的伴侣都更接近自己的年龄。除了伴侣的年龄之外,病原体的流行程度和性别平等都不能强有力地预测各国之间的性别差异或偏好。