National Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Systems Biology of Pathogens and Christophe Mérieux Laboratory, Institute of Pathogen Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Laboratory of Infectious Diseases Center of Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):778-785. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa310.
The emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a major healthcare threat. The current method of detection involves a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based technique, which identifies the viral nucleic acids when present in sufficient quantity. False-negative results can be achieved and failure to quarantine the infected patient would be a major setback in containing the viral transmission. We aim to describe the time kinetics of various antibodies produced against the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) and evaluate the potential of antibody testing to diagnose COVID-19.
The host humoral response against SARS-CoV-2, including IgA, IgM, and IgG response, was examined by using an ELISA-based assay on the recombinant viral nucleocapsid protein. 208 plasma samples were collected from 82 confirmed and 58 probable cases (qPCR negative but with typical manifestation). The diagnostic value of IgM was evaluated in this cohort.
The median duration of IgM and IgA antibody detection was 5 (IQR, 3-6) days, while IgG was detected 14 (IQR, 10-18) days after symptom onset, with a positive rate of 85.4%, 92.7%, and 77.9%, respectively. In confirmed and probable cases, the positive rates of IgM antibodies were 75.6% and 93.1%, respectively. The detection efficiency by IgM ELISA is higher than that of qPCR after 5.5 days of symptom onset. The positive detection rate is significantly increased (98.6%) when combining IgM ELISA assay with PCR for each patient compared with a single qPCR test (51.9%).
The humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 can aid in the diagnosis of COVID-19, including subclinical cases.
2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的出现是对医疗保健的重大威胁。目前的检测方法涉及基于定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)的技术,当病毒核酸存在且数量充足时,该技术可识别出它们。可能会出现假阴性结果,如果未能对感染患者进行隔离,将是控制病毒传播的重大挫折。我们旨在描述针对 2019 年新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)产生的各种抗体的时间动力学,并评估抗体检测在诊断 COVID-19 中的潜力。
使用基于 ELISA 的方法检测针对 SARS-CoV-2 的宿主体液反应,包括 IgA、IgM 和 IgG 反应,使用的是重组病毒核衣壳蛋白。从 82 例确诊病例和 58 例疑似病例(qPCR 阴性但具有典型表现)中收集了 208 份血浆样本。在该队列中评估了 IgM 的诊断价值。
IgM 和 IgA 抗体检测的中位持续时间分别为 5(IQR,3-6)天,而 IgG 则在症状出现后 14(IQR,10-18)天被检测到,阳性率分别为 85.4%、92.7%和 77.9%。在确诊和疑似病例中,IgM 抗体的阳性率分别为 75.6%和 93.1%。在症状出现后 5.5 天,IgM ELISA 的检测效率高于 qPCR。与单一 qPCR 测试(51.9%)相比,将 IgM ELISA 检测与每位患者的 PCR 相结合时,阳性检出率显著增加(98.6%)。
SARS-CoV-2 的体液反应有助于 COVID-19 的诊断,包括亚临床病例。