Suppr超能文献

不同程度的碳水化合物限制和替代对人体心血管代谢风险标志物的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The Effects of Different Degrees of Carbohydrate Restriction and Carbohydrate Replacement on Cardiometabolic Risk Markers in Humans-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2020 Apr 2;12(4):991. doi: 10.3390/nu12040991.

Abstract

Low-carbohydrate diets (LCDs) often differ in their diet composition, which may lead to conflicting results between randomized controlled trials. Therefore, we aimed to compare the effects of different degrees of carbohydrate (CHO) restriction on cardiometabolic risk markers in humans. The experimental LCDs of 37 human trials were classified as (1) moderate-low CHO diets (<45-40 E%, = 13), (2) low CHO diets (<40-30 E%, = 16), and (3) very-low CHO diets (<30-3 E%; = 8). Summary estimates of weighted mean differences (WMDs) in selected risk markers were calculated using random-effect meta-analyses. Differences between the LCD groups were assessed with univariate meta-regression analyses. Overall, the LCDs resulted in significant weight loss, reduced diastolic blood pressure BP, and increased total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), without significant differences between the three LCD groups. Higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations were found with the very-low CHO diets compared to the moderate-low CHO diets. Decreases in triacylglycerol (TAG) concentrations were more pronounced with the low and very-low CHO diets, compared to the moderate-low CHO diets. Substitution of CHO by mainly saturated fatty acids (SFAs) increased total cholesterol, LDL-C, and HDL-C concentrations. Except for LDL-C and TAGs, effects were not related to the degree of CHO restriction. Potential effects of nutrient exchanges should be considered when following LCDs.

摘要

低碳水化合物饮食(LCDs)在其饮食组成上往往存在差异,这可能导致随机对照试验之间的结果产生冲突。因此,我们旨在比较不同程度的碳水化合物(CHO)限制对人体心血管代谢风险标志物的影响。37 项人体试验的实验性 LCD 被分为(1)中低 CHO 饮食(<45-40%E,n=13),(2)低 CHO 饮食(<40-30%E,n=16)和(3)非常低 CHO 饮食(<30-3%E;n=8)。使用随机效应荟萃分析计算选定风险标志物的加权均数差值(WMD)的汇总估计值。使用单变量荟萃回归分析评估 LCD 组之间的差异。总体而言,LCD 导致体重显著减轻,舒张压 BP 降低,总胆固醇和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)增加,但三种 LCD 组之间没有显著差异。与中低 CHO 饮食相比,非常低 CHO 饮食组的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)浓度更高。与中低 CHO 饮食相比,低 CHO 和非常低 CHO 饮食组的三酰甘油(TAG)浓度降低更为明显。用主要饱和脂肪酸(SFAs)替代 CHO 会增加总胆固醇、LDL-C 和 HDL-C 浓度。除了 LDL-C 和 TAG 之外,这些效果与 CHO 限制的程度无关。在遵循 LCD 时,应考虑营养交换的潜在影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验