Suppr超能文献

基于生理学的药代动力学模型输出取决于溶出数据及其输入:格列本脲和双嘧达莫的案例

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model outputs depend on dissolution data and their input: Case examples glibenclamide and dipyridamole.

作者信息

Klumpp Lukas, Dressman Jennifer

机构信息

Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Goethe University and Fraunhofer Institute of Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology (IME) Division of Translational Medicine and Pharmacology (TMP), Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Goethe University and Fraunhofer Institute of Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology (IME) Division of Translational Medicine and Pharmacology (TMP), Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Pharm Sci. 2020 Aug 1;151:105380. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2020.105380. Epub 2020 May 19.

Abstract

A plethora of dissolution tests exists for oral dosage forms, with variations in selection of the dissolution medium, the hydrodynamics and the dissolution equipment. This work aimed at determining the influence of media composition, the type of dissolution test and the method for entering the data into a PBPK model on the ability to simulate the in vivo plasma profile of an immediate release formulation. Using two rDCS IIa substances, glibenclamide and dipyridamole, housed in immediate-release formulations as model dosage forms, dissolution tests were performed in USP apparatus II with the biorelevant media FaSSGF, FaSSIF V1, V2 and V3 using both single-stage and two-stage test designs. The results were then integrated into the PBPK software Simcyp either as the observed release profile (dissolution rate model, DRM) or using a semi-mechanistic model (diffusion layer model, DLM) and compared with in vivo plasma profiles. The selection of the FaSSIF version did not appear to have any relevant influence on the dissolution of the weakly basic dipyridamole, while the weakly acidic glibenclamide was sensitive to the difference in pH between FaSSIF V1, V2 and FaSSIF V3. Since both compounds have pKa values close to the pH of biorelevant media representing conditions in the small intestine, these results may be specific to compounds with similar ionization behavior. Single-stage and two-stage testing led to equivalent simulations for glibenclamide. Only results from the single-stage test in FaSSGF led to a close simulation of the pharmacokinetic profile of dipyridamole when data were inputted using the DRM, while simulations from two-stage testing were most similar to the observed pharmacokinetic profile when DLM with selection of a dynamic pH profile in the small intestine was selected as the data input method. These results emphasize the importance of data input to the simulation results.

摘要

对于口服剂型,有大量的溶出度测试方法,在溶出介质的选择、流体动力学和溶出设备方面存在差异。这项工作旨在确定介质组成、溶出度测试类型以及将数据输入到生理药代动力学(PBPK)模型的方法对模拟速释制剂体内血浆曲线能力的影响。以两种处于速释制剂中的rDCS IIa物质格列本脲和双嘧达莫作为模型剂型,在USP II型装置中使用生物相关介质FaSSGF、FaSSIF V1、V2和V3,采用单阶段和两阶段测试设计进行溶出度测试。然后将结果作为观察到的释放曲线(溶出速率模型,DRM)或使用半机械模型(扩散层模型,DLM)整合到PBPK软件Simcyp中,并与体内血浆曲线进行比较。FaSSIF版本的选择似乎对弱碱性双嘧达莫的溶出没有任何相关影响,而弱酸性格列本脲对FaSSIF V1、V2和FaSSIF V3之间的pH差异敏感。由于这两种化合物的pKa值接近代表小肠条件的生物相关介质的pH值,这些结果可能特定于具有相似电离行为的化合物。单阶段和两阶段测试对格列本脲产生了等效的模拟结果。当使用DRM输入数据时,只有在FaSSGF中进行的单阶段测试结果能接近模拟双嘧达莫的药代动力学曲线,而当选择在小肠中具有动态pH曲线的DLM作为数据输入方法时,两阶段测试的模拟结果与观察到的药代动力学曲线最为相似。这些结果强调了数据输入对模拟结果的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验