Suppr超能文献

限制堕胎服务获取和美国婴儿死亡率风险的法律。

Laws Restricting Access to Abortion Services and Infant Mortality Risk in the United States.

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB 11405-87, T6G 1C9, Canada.

School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 26;17(11):3773. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113773.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Since the US Supreme Court's 1973 decision legalizing abortion, states have enacted laws restricting access to abortion services. Previous studies suggest that restricting access to abortion is a risk factor for adverse maternal and infant health. The objective of this investigation is to study the relationship between the type and the number of state-level restrictive abortion laws and infant mortality risk.

METHODS

We used data on 11,972,629 infants and mothers from the US Cohort Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Files 2008-2010. State-level abortion laws included Medicaid funding restrictions, mandatory parental involvement, mandatory counseling, mandatory waiting period, and two-visit laws. Multilevel logistic regression was used to determine whether type or number of state-level restrictive abortion laws during year of birth were associated with odds of infant mortality.

RESULTS

Compared to infants living in states with no restrictive laws, infants living in states with one or two restrictive laws (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.99-1.18) and those living in states with 3 to 5 restrictive laws (AOR = 1.10; 95% CI = 1.01-1.20) were more likely to die. Separate analyses examining the relationship between parental involvement laws and infant mortality risk, stratified by maternal age, indicated that significant associations were observed among mothers aged ≤19 years (AOR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.00-1.19), and 20 to 25 years (AOR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.03-1.17). No significant association was observed among infants born to older mothers.

CONCLUSION

Restricting access to abortion services may increase the risk for infant mortality.

摘要

目的

自美国最高法院 1973 年裁定堕胎合法化以来,各州已颁布法律限制堕胎服务的获取。先前的研究表明,限制堕胎服务的获取是导致母婴健康不良的一个风险因素。本研究旨在研究州级限制堕胎法律的类型和数量与婴儿死亡率风险之间的关系。

方法

我们使用了来自美国队列链接出生/婴儿死亡数据文件 2008-2010 年的 11972629 名婴儿和母亲的数据。州级堕胎法包括医疗补助资金限制、强制性父母参与、强制性咨询、强制性等待期和两次就诊法。使用多水平逻辑回归来确定出生年份的州级限制堕胎法的类型或数量是否与婴儿死亡率的几率相关。

结果

与生活在没有限制法律的州的婴儿相比,生活在有一个或两个限制法律的州的婴儿(调整后的优势比 (AOR) = 1.08;95%置信区间 [CI] = 0.99-1.18)和生活在有 3 至 5 个限制法律的州的婴儿(AOR = 1.10;95% CI = 1.01-1.20)更有可能死亡。分别分析母亲年龄分层的父母参与法与婴儿死亡率风险的关系表明,在年龄≤19 岁的母亲中观察到显著关联(AOR = 1.09,95% CI = 1.00-1.19),在 20 至 25 岁的母亲中观察到显著关联(AOR = 1.10,95% CI = 1.03-1.17)。在年龄较大的母亲所生的婴儿中未观察到显著关联。

结论

限制堕胎服务的获取可能会增加婴儿死亡率的风险。

相似文献

1
Laws Restricting Access to Abortion Services and Infant Mortality Risk in the United States.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 26;17(11):3773. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113773.
2
The relationship between restrictive state abortion laws and postpartum depression.
Soc Work Public Health. 2014;29(5):481-90. doi: 10.1080/19371918.2013.873997.
4
Health Equity in a Post 'Roe Versus Wade' America.
Cureus. 2022 Dec 1;14(12):e32100. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32100. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
The relationship between state abortion-restrictions and homicide deaths among children under 5 years of age: a longitudinal study.
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jul;75(1):156-64. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.01.037. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
6
How are restrictive abortion statutes associated with unintended teen birth?
J Adolesc Health. 2010 Aug;47(2):160-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.01.003. Epub 2010 Mar 20.
7
Abortion Restrictiveness and Infant Mortality: An Ecologic Study, 2014-2018.
Am J Prev Med. 2024 Mar;66(3):418-426. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.10.010. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
8
The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health.
Nurse Pract. 1991 Dec;16(12):53-9. doi: 10.1097/00006205-199112000-00013.
9

引用本文的文献

1
The role of restrictive abortion laws on modern contraceptive use in Sub Saharan Africa.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jul 10;5(7):e0004875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004875. eCollection 2025.
3
Accuracy and Misleadingness of Anatomical and Embryological Statements in State-Level Abortion Ban Legislation in the United States.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Mar;57(1):17-24. doi: 10.1111/psrh.70001. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
4
US Abortion Bans and Infant Mortality.
JAMA. 2025 Apr 15;333(15):1315-1323. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.28517.
5
County-Level Structural Vulnerabilities in Maternal Health and Geographic Variation in Infant Mortality.
J Pediatr. 2025 Jan;276:114274. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114274. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
6
7
The association between reproductive rights and access to abortion services and mental health among US women.
SSM Popul Health. 2023 May 12;23:101428. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101428. eCollection 2023 Sep.
8
Association Between Rates of Down Syndrome Diagnosis in States With vs Without 20-Week Abortion Bans From 2011 to 2018.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e233684. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.3684.
10
From Restrictions to Outright Challenges: Abortion Laws and Population Health.
Am J Public Health. 2021 Sep;111(9):1578-1580. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306469. Epub 2021 Aug 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceived abortion stigma and psychological well-being over five years after receiving or being denied an abortion.
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 29;15(1):e0226417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226417. eCollection 2020.
2
Abortion laws reform may reduce maternal mortality: an ecological study in 162 countries.
BMC Womens Health. 2019 Jan 5;19(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0705-y.
3
Mortality in the United States, 2017.
NCHS Data Brief. 2018 Nov(328):1-8.
7
Epidemiology of maternal depression, risk factors, and child outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;3(10):973-982. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30284-X. Epub 2016 Sep 17.
9
Reduced Disparities in Birth Rates Among Teens Aged 15-19 Years - United States, 2006-2007 and 2013-2014.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Apr 29;65(16):409-14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6516a1.
10
Catalyzing a Reproductive Health and Social Justice Movement.
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Apr;20(4):741-8. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1917-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验