Suppr超能文献

验证 UNESP-Botucatu 猪综合急性疼痛量表(UPAPS)。

Validation of the UNESP-Botucatu pig composite acute pain scale (UPAPS).

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.

Post graduation Program in Anaesthesiology, Medical School, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Jun 1;15(6):e0233552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233552. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

The creation of species-specific valid tools for pain assessment is essential to recognize pain and determine the requirement and efficacy of analgesic treatments. This study aimed to assess behaviour and investigate the validity and reliability of an acute pain scale in pigs undergoing orchiectomy. Forty-five pigs aged 38±3 days were castrated under local anaesthesia. Behaviour was video-recorded 30 minutes before and intermittently up to 24 hours after castration. Edited footage (before surgery, after surgery before and after rescue analgesia, and 24 hours postoperatively) was analysed twice (one month apart) by one observer who was present during video-recording (in-person researcher) and three blinded observers. Statistical analysis was performed using R software and differences were considered significant when p<0.05. Intra and inter-observer agreement, based on intra-class correlation coefficient, was good or very good between most observers (>0.60), except between observers 1 and 3 (moderate agreement 0.57). The scale was unidimensional according to principal component analysis. The scale showed acceptable item-total Spearman correlation, excellent predictive and concurrent criterion validity (Spearman correlation ≥ 0.85 between the proposed scale versus visual analogue, numerical rating, and simple descriptive scales), internal consistency (Cronbach's α coefficient >0.80 for all items), responsiveness (the pain scores of all items of the scale increased after castration and decreased after intervention analgesia according to Friedman test), and specificity (> 95%). Sensitivity was good or excellent for most of the items. The optimal cut-off point for rescue analgesia was ≥ 6 of 18. Discriminatory ability was excellent for all observers according to the area under the curve (>0.95). The proposed scale is a reliable and valid instrument and may be used clinically and experimentally to assess postoperative acute pain in pigs. The well-defined cut-off point supports the evaluator´s decision to provide or not analgesia.

摘要

创建特定于物种的有效疼痛评估工具对于识别疼痛以及确定镇痛治疗的需求和疗效至关重要。本研究旨在评估行为,并研究一种在接受去势术的猪中评估急性疼痛的量表的有效性和可靠性。45 头 38±3 日龄的猪在局部麻醉下进行去势。在去势前 30 分钟和去势后 24 小时内间歇性地对行为进行视频记录。对编辑后的视频片段(术前、术后、术后镇痛前和术后 24 小时)进行分析,由一名观察者(在场的录像观察者)和三名盲法观察者分别在相隔一个月的两次分析中进行。使用 R 软件进行统计分析,当 p<0.05 时,差异被认为具有统计学意义。基于组内相关系数,大多数观察者之间的观察者内和观察者间一致性较好或非常好(>0.60),除了观察者 1 和 3 之间的一致性为中等(0.57)。根据主成分分析,该量表具有一维性。该量表显示出可接受的项目-总分斯皮尔曼相关性,优异的预测和同时标准效度(建议的量表与视觉模拟量表、数字评分量表和简单描述量表之间的斯皮尔曼相关性≥0.85),内部一致性(所有项目的克朗巴赫's α 系数>0.80),反应性(根据 Friedman 检验,所有项目的疼痛评分在去势后增加,在干预镇痛后减少)和特异性(>95%)。大多数项目的敏感性较好或很好。最佳的救命镇痛截断点为 18 分中的≥6 分。根据曲线下面积,所有观察者的区分能力都很好或极好(>0.95)。该量表是一种可靠和有效的工具,可在临床和实验中用于评估猪的术后急性疼痛。明确的截断点支持评估者是否提供镇痛的决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12fc/7263847/7dd56f116f04/pone.0233552.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验