Russo Rienna, Li Yan, Chong Stella, Siscovick David, Trinh-Shevrin Chau, Yi Stella
NYU School of Medicine, Department of Population Health, New York, NY, United States.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Population Health Science and Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Prev Med Rep. 2020 May 31;19:101135. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101135. eCollection 2020 Sep.
Prior reviews describing approach, methodological quality and effectiveness of dietary policies and programs may be limited in use for practitioners seeking to introduce innovative programming, or academic researchers hoping to understand and address gaps in the current literature. This review is novel, assessing the "where, who, and in whom" of dietary policies and programs research in the United States over the past decade - with results intended to serve as a practical guide and foundation for innovation. This study was conducted from October 2018 to March 2019. Papers were selected through a tailored search strategy on PubMed as well as citation searches, to identify grey literature. A total of 489 papers were relevant to our research objective. The largest proportion of papers described school-based strategies (31%) or included economic incentives (19%). In papers that specified demographics, the study populations most often included children, adults and adolescents (54%, 46%, and 42% respectively); and White, Black and Hispanic populations (77%, 76% and 70%, respectively). Results highlight opportunities for future research within workplace and faith-based settings, among racial/ethnic minorities, and older adults.
先前关于饮食政策与计划的方法、方法学质量及有效性的综述,对于寻求引入创新计划的从业者,或希望理解并填补当前文献空白的学术研究人员而言,其用途可能有限。本综述具有创新性,评估了过去十年美国饮食政策与计划研究中的“地点、对象以及具体人群”,其结果旨在为创新提供实用指南和基础。本研究于2018年10月至2019年3月进行。通过在PubMed上的定制搜索策略以及引文搜索来挑选论文,以识别灰色文献。共有489篇论文与我们的研究目标相关。最大比例的论文描述了基于学校的策略(31%)或包含经济激励措施(19%)。在明确了人口统计学特征的论文中,研究人群最常包括儿童、成年人和青少年(分别为54%、46%和42%);以及白人、黑人和西班牙裔人群(分别为77%、76%和70%)。结果突出了在工作场所和基于信仰的环境中、在少数族裔以及老年人中开展未来研究的机会。