Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Jun 2;11:311. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00311. eCollection 2020.
Although results of animal research show that interactions between stress and sex hormones are implicated in the development of affective disorders in women, translation of these findings to patients has been scarce. As a basic step toward advancing this field of research, we analyzed findings of studies which reported circulating cortisol levels in healthy women in the follicular . luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. We deemed this analysis critical not only to advance our understanding of basic physiology, but also as an important contrast to the findings of future studies evaluating stress and sex hormones in women with affective disorders. We hypothesized that cortisol levels would be lower in the follicular phase based on the proposition that changes in levels of potent GABAergic neurosteroids, including allopregnanolone, during the menstrual cycle dynamically change in the opposite direction relative to cortisol levels. Implementing strict inclusion criteria, we compiled results of high-quality studies involving 778 study participants to derive a standardized mean difference between circulating cortisol levels in the follicular vs. luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. In line with our hypothesis, our meta-analysis found that women in the follicular phase had higher cortisol levels than women in the luteal phase, with an overall Hedges' of 0.13 ( < 0.01) for the random effects model. No significant between-study difference was detected, with the level of heterogeneity in the small range. Furthermore, there was no evidence of publication bias. As cortisol regulation is a delicate process, we review some of the basic mechanisms by which progesterone, its potent metabolites, and estradiol regulate cortisol output and circulation to contribute to the net effect of higher cortisol in the follicular phase.
虽然动物研究的结果表明,应激和性激素之间的相互作用与女性情感障碍的发展有关,但这些发现转化为患者的情况却很少。作为推进这一研究领域的基本步骤,我们分析了报告健康女性在月经周期滤泡期和黄体期循环皮质醇水平的研究结果。我们认为,这种分析不仅对推进我们对基本生理学的理解至关重要,而且对评估患有情感障碍的女性应激和性激素的未来研究的结果也是一个重要的对比。我们假设,根据在月经周期中,包括孕烷醇酮在内的强效 GABA 能神经甾体的水平变化与皮质醇水平呈相反方向动态变化的观点,皮质醇水平在滤泡期会降低。我们实施了严格的纳入标准,汇编了涉及 778 名研究参与者的高质量研究的结果,以得出月经周期滤泡期与黄体期循环皮质醇水平之间的标准化均数差。与我们的假设一致,我们的荟萃分析发现,滤泡期女性的皮质醇水平高于黄体期女性,随机效应模型的总体 Hedges' 为 0.13(<0.01)。未检测到研究间的显著差异,异质性水平处于较小范围。此外,没有发表偏倚的证据。由于皮质醇调节是一个微妙的过程,我们回顾了一些基本机制,即孕激素、其强效代谢物和雌二醇如何调节皮质醇的产生和循环,从而导致滤泡期皮质醇水平升高的净效应。