He Peng, Bai Ming, Hu Jin-Ping, Dong Chen, Sun Shiren, Huang Chen
Department of Nephrology, Xijin Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Graduate School, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Kidney Blood Press Res. 2020;45(4):497-509. doi: 10.1159/000507858. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is a promising marker for the diagnosis of diabetic kidney disease (DKD), but its utility is currently debated. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of NGAL for DKD.
MEDLINE, Embase, -Cochrane Library, CNKI, and CBM databases were searched up to April 13, 2019. In bivariate random-effect models, the diagnostic performance of NGAL for DKD was assessed using pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristic analysis.
Nineteen studies were eligible for the meta-analysis. Serum NGAL had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.79 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.60-0.91) and 0.87 (0.75-0.93) (7 studies, 1,238 patients). The pooled positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) were 5.97 (3.03-11.76) and 0.24 (0.11-0.51). For urine NGAL, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+, and LR- were 0.85 (0.74-0.91), 0.74 (0.57-0.86), 3.26 (1.87-5.67), and 0.21 (0.12-0.35), respectively (10 studies, 1,369 patients). The pooled sensitivity and specificity for kidney disease in normoalbuminuric patients with diabetes was 0.90 (0.82-0.95) and 0.97 (0.90-0.99) for both serum NGAL and 0.94 (0.87-0.98) and 0.90 (0.81-0.96) for urine NGAL (4 studies, 221 patients). NGAL appeared to perform similarly in subgroup analysis.
The meta-analysis has shown that NGAL may be useful for DKD classification and also has a potential diagnostic value for normoalbuminuric kidney disease. Large-scale prospective studies are required to clarify its role in the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with DKD.
中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白(NGAL)是诊断糖尿病肾病(DKD)的一个有前景的标志物,但目前其效用存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在评估NGAL对DKD的诊断价值。
检索截至2019年4月13日的MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、中国知网和中国生物医学文献数据库。在双变量随机效应模型中,使用敏感性、特异性、似然比、诊断比值比的合并估计值以及分层汇总接受者操作特征分析来评估NGAL对DKD的诊断性能。
19项研究符合荟萃分析的纳入标准。血清NGAL的合并敏感性和特异性分别为0.79(95%置信区间[CI] 0.60 - 0.91)和0.87(0.75 - 0.93)(7项研究,1238例患者)。合并阳性似然比(LR +)和阴性似然比(LR -)分别为5.97(3.03 - 11.76)和0.24(0.11 - 0.51)。对于尿NGAL,合并敏感性、特异性、LR +和LR -分别为0.85(0.74 - 0.91)、0.74(0.57 - 0.86)、3.26(1.87 - 5.67)和0.21(0.12 - 0.35)(10项研究,1369例患者)。糖尿病正常白蛋白尿患者中肾病的血清NGAL合并敏感性和特异性分别为0.90(0.82 - 0.95)和0.97(0.90 - 0.99),尿NGAL分别为0.94(0.87 - 0.98)和0.90(0.81 - 0.96)(4项研究,221例患者)。在亚组分析中,NGAL表现相似。
荟萃分析表明,NGAL可能有助于DKD的分类,对正常白蛋白尿肾病也具有潜在的诊断价值。需要大规模的前瞻性研究来阐明其在DKD患者诊断和风险分层中的作用。