Wahid Syed Shabab, Pedersen Gloria A, Ottman Katherine, Burgess Abigail, Gautam Kamal, Martini Thais, Viduani Anna, Momodu Olufisayo, Lam Crystal, Fisher Helen L, Kieling Christian, Adewuya Abiodun O, Mondelli Valeria, Kohrt Brandon A
Division of Global Mental Health, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
SGDP Centre, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 28;10(7):e034335. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034335.
Globally, depression is a leading cause of disability among adolescents, and suicide rates are increasing among youth. Treatment alone is insufficient to address the issue. Early identification and prevention efforts are necessary to reduce morbidity and mortality. The Identifying Depression Early in Adolescence (IDEA) consortium is developing risk detection strategies that incorporate biological, psychological and social factors that can be evaluated in diverse global populations. In addition to epidemiological and neuroscience research, the IDEA consortium is conducting a qualitative study to explore three domains of inquiry: (1) cultural heterogeneity of biopsychosocial risk factors and lived experience of adolescent depression in low-income and middle-income countries (LMIC); (2) the feasibility, acceptability and ethics of a risk calculator tool for adolescent depression that can be used in LMIC and high-income countries and (3) capacity for biological research into biomarkers for depression risk among adolescents in LMIC. This is a multisite qualitative study being conducted in Brazil, Nepal, Nigeria and the UK.
A systematic set of qualitative methods will be used in this study. The Delphi method, Theory of Change (ToC) workshops, key-informant interviews and focus group discussions will be used to elicit perspectives on the study topics from a broad range of stakeholders (adolescents, parents, policy-makers, teachers, health service providers, social workers and experts). Delphi panellists will participate in three survey rounds to generate consensus through facilitated feedback. Stakeholders will create ToC models via facilitated workshops in the LMIC sites. The framework approach will be used to analyse data from the study.
Ethical approvals were received from the Ethics Review Board of George Washington University and from site-specific institutions in Brazil, Nepal, Nigeria and the UK. The findings generated from this study will be reported in highly accessed, peer-reviewed, scientific and health policy journals.
在全球范围内,抑郁症是青少年残疾的主要原因,青年自杀率也在上升。仅靠治疗不足以解决这一问题。早期识别和预防措施对于降低发病率和死亡率至关重要。青少年抑郁症早期识别(IDEA)联盟正在制定风险检测策略,该策略纳入了可在全球不同人群中进行评估的生物、心理和社会因素。除了流行病学和神经科学研究外,IDEA联盟正在开展一项定性研究,以探索三个研究领域:(1)低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)中生物心理社会风险因素的文化异质性以及青少年抑郁症的生活经历;(2)一种可用于LMIC和高收入国家的青少年抑郁症风险计算器工具的可行性、可接受性和伦理问题;(3)LMIC中青少年抑郁症风险生物标志物的生物学研究能力。这是一项在巴西、尼泊尔、尼日利亚和英国开展的多地点定性研究。
本研究将使用一套系统的定性方法。德尔菲法、变革理论(ToC)研讨会、关键信息提供者访谈和焦点小组讨论将用于从广泛的利益相关者(青少年、家长、政策制定者、教师、卫生服务提供者、社会工作者和专家)中获取对研究主题的看法。德尔菲小组成员将参加三轮调查,通过促进反馈达成共识。利益相关者将通过在LMIC地点举办的促进研讨会创建ToC模型。将使用框架方法分析研究数据。
已获得乔治华盛顿大学伦理审查委员会以及巴西、尼泊尔、尼日利亚和英国特定地点机构的伦理批准。本研究产生的结果将在高影响力、同行评审的科学和卫生政策期刊上发表。