Suter Leonie, Polanowski Andrea Maree, Clarke Laurence John, Kitchener John Andrew, Deagle Bruce Emerson
Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Kingston, Tas., Australia.
Institute of Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas., Australia.
Mol Ecol. 2021 Jul;30(13):3140-3157. doi: 10.1111/mec.15587. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is emerging as a novel, objective tool for monitoring marine metazoan biodiversity. Zooplankton biodiversity in the vast open ocean is currently monitored through continuous plankton recorder (CPR) surveys, using ship-based bulk plankton sampling and morphological identification. We assessed whether eDNA metabarcoding (2 L filtered seawater) could capture similar Southern Ocean zooplankton biodiversity as conventional CPR bulk sampling (~1,500 L filtered seawater per CPR sample). We directly compared eDNA metabarcoding with (a) conventional morphological CPR sampling and (b) bulk DNA metabarcoding of CPR collected plankton (two transects for each comparison, 40 and 44 paired samples, respectively). A metazoan-targeted cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) marker was used to characterize species-level diversity. In the 2 L seawater eDNA samples, this marker amplified large amounts of non-metazoan picoplanktonic algae, but eDNA metabarcoding still detected up to 1.6 times more zooplankton species than morphologically analysed bulk CPR samples. COI metabarcoding of bulk DNA samples mostly avoided nonmetazoan amplifications and recovered more zooplankton species than eDNA metabarcoding. However, eDNA metabarcoding detected roughly two thirds of metazoan species and identified similar taxa contributing to community differentiation across the subtropical front separating transects. We observed a diurnal pattern in eDNA data for copepods which perform diel vertical migrations, indicating a surprisingly short temporal eDNA signal. Compared to COI, a eukaryote-targeted 18S ribosomal RNA marker detected a higher proportion, but lower diversity, of metazoans in eDNA. With refinement and standardization of methodology, eDNA metabarcoding could become an efficient tool for monitoring open ocean biodiversity.
环境DNA(eDNA)宏条形码分析正成为一种用于监测海洋后生动物生物多样性的新型客观工具。目前,广阔公海中的浮游动物生物多样性是通过连续浮游生物记录器(CPR)调查来监测的,采用基于船舶的大量浮游生物采样和形态学鉴定方法。我们评估了eDNA宏条形码分析(2升过滤海水)能否捕获与传统CPR大量采样(每个CPR样本约1500升过滤海水)相似的南大洋浮游动物生物多样性。我们将eDNA宏条形码分析直接与(a)传统的CPR形态学采样以及(b)CPR采集的浮游生物的大量DNA宏条形码分析进行了比较(每次比较各有两个断面,分别有40和44对样本)。使用后生动物靶向的细胞色素c氧化酶I(COI)标记来表征物种水平的多样性。在2升海水的eDNA样本中,该标记扩增出了大量非后生动物的微微型浮游藻类,但eDNA宏条形码分析仍检测到比形态学分析的CPR大量样本多1.6倍的浮游动物物种。大量DNA样本的COI宏条形码分析大多避免了非后生动物的扩增,并且比eDNA宏条形码分析发现了更多的浮游动物物种。然而,eDNA宏条形码分析检测到了约三分之二的后生动物物种,并识别出了在分隔断面的亚热带锋面两侧对群落分化有贡献的相似分类群。我们在进行昼夜垂直迁移的桡足类动物的eDNA数据中观察到了昼夜模式,这表明eDNA信号的时间惊人地短。与COI相比,真核生物靶向的18S核糖体RNA标记在eDNA中检测到的后生动物比例更高,但多样性更低。随着方法的完善和标准化,eDNA宏条形码分析可能会成为监测公海生物多样性的有效工具。