National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Learning & Research Building (Level 1), Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Ann Med. 2020 Dec;52(8):471-478. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2020.1815078. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
We aimed to determine whether handgrip strength (HGS)improves type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk prediction beyond conventional risk factors.
Handgrip strength was assessed at baseline in 776 individuals aged 60-72 years without a history of T2D in a prospective cohort. Handgrip strength was normalized to account for the effect of body weight. Hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence intervals [CI]) and measures of risk discrimination for T2D and reclassification [net reclassification improvement (NRI), integrated discrimination index (IDI)] were assessed.
During 18.1 years median follow-up, 59 T2D events were recorded. The HR (95% CI)for T2D adjusted for conventional risk factors was 0.49 (0.31-0.80) per 1 standard deviation higher normalised HGS and was 0.54 (0.31-0.95) and 0.53 (0.29-0.97) on adjustment for risk factors in the DESIR and KORA S4/F4 prediction models, respectively. Adding normalised HGS to these risk scores was associated with improved risk prediction as measured by differences in -2 log likelihood, NRI and IDI. Sex-specific HRs and risk prediction findings using sensitive measures suggested the overall results were driven by those in women.
Adding measurements of HGS to conventional risk factors might improve T2D risk assessment, especially in women. Further evaluation is needed in larger studies. KEY MESSAGES Handgrip strength (HGS) is independently associated with reduced risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D), but its utility in classifying or predicting T2D risk has not been explored. In this prospective cohort study of older Caucasian men and women, adding measurements of HGS to conventional risk factors improved T2D risk assessment, especially in women. Assessment of HGS is simple and inexpensive and could prove a valuable clinical tool in the early identification of people at high risk of future T2D.
我们旨在确定握力(HGS)是否可以改善 2 型糖尿病(T2D)的风险预测,超越传统危险因素。
在一项前瞻性队列研究中,对 776 名年龄在 60-72 岁、无 T2D 病史的个体进行了基线握力评估。为了考虑体重的影响,对握力进行了归一化处理。评估了 T2D 的危险比(HR)(95%置信区间[CI])和风险判别测量值[净重新分类改善(NRI)、综合判别指数(IDI)]。
在 18.1 年的中位随访期间,记录了 59 例 T2D 事件。调整了传统危险因素后的 T2D 每增加 1 个标准差的 HR(95%CI)为 0.49(0.31-0.80),调整 DESIR 和 KORA S4/F4 预测模型中的危险因素后,HR 分别为 0.54(0.31-0.95)和 0.53(0.29-0.97)。将归一化后的 HGS 加入到这些风险评分中,可通过 -2 对数似然、NRI 和 IDI 的差异来提高风险预测。使用敏感指标的性别特异性 HR 和风险预测结果表明,总体结果主要由女性结果驱动。
将 HGS 的测量值添加到传统危险因素中可能会改善 T2D 的风险评估,尤其是在女性中。需要在更大的研究中进一步评估。关键信息握力(HGS)与 2 型糖尿病(T2D)风险降低独立相关,但尚未探讨其在 T2D 风险分类或预测中的作用。在这项针对老年白种人男性和女性的前瞻性队列研究中,将 HGS 的测量值添加到传统危险因素中可改善 T2D 的风险评估,尤其是在女性中。HGS 的评估简单且经济实惠,可能成为早期识别未来 T2D 高危人群的有价值的临床工具。