Suppr超能文献

握力提高了 2 型糖尿病的预测能力:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Handgrip strength improves prediction of type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study.

机构信息

National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Learning & Research Building (Level 1), Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Ann Med. 2020 Dec;52(8):471-478. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2020.1815078. Epub 2020 Sep 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We aimed to determine whether handgrip strength (HGS)improves type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk prediction beyond conventional risk factors.

DESIGN

Handgrip strength was assessed at baseline in 776 individuals aged 60-72 years without a history of T2D in a prospective cohort. Handgrip strength was normalized to account for the effect of body weight. Hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence intervals [CI]) and measures of risk discrimination for T2D and reclassification [net reclassification improvement (NRI), integrated discrimination index (IDI)] were assessed.

RESULTS

During 18.1 years median follow-up, 59 T2D events were recorded. The HR (95% CI)for T2D adjusted for conventional risk factors was 0.49 (0.31-0.80) per 1 standard deviation higher normalised HGS and was 0.54 (0.31-0.95) and 0.53 (0.29-0.97) on adjustment for risk factors in the DESIR and KORA S4/F4 prediction models, respectively. Adding normalised HGS to these risk scores was associated with improved risk prediction as measured by differences in -2 log likelihood, NRI and IDI. Sex-specific HRs and risk prediction findings using sensitive measures suggested the overall results were driven by those in women.

CONCLUSION

Adding measurements of HGS to conventional risk factors might improve T2D risk assessment, especially in women. Further evaluation is needed in larger studies. KEY MESSAGES Handgrip strength (HGS) is independently associated with reduced risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D), but its utility in classifying or predicting T2D risk has not been explored. In this prospective cohort study of older Caucasian men and women, adding measurements of HGS to conventional risk factors improved T2D risk assessment, especially in women. Assessment of HGS is simple and inexpensive and could prove a valuable clinical tool in the early identification of people at high risk of future T2D.

摘要

目的

我们旨在确定握力(HGS)是否可以改善 2 型糖尿病(T2D)的风险预测,超越传统危险因素。

设计

在一项前瞻性队列研究中,对 776 名年龄在 60-72 岁、无 T2D 病史的个体进行了基线握力评估。为了考虑体重的影响,对握力进行了归一化处理。评估了 T2D 的危险比(HR)(95%置信区间[CI])和风险判别测量值[净重新分类改善(NRI)、综合判别指数(IDI)]。

结果

在 18.1 年的中位随访期间,记录了 59 例 T2D 事件。调整了传统危险因素后的 T2D 每增加 1 个标准差的 HR(95%CI)为 0.49(0.31-0.80),调整 DESIR 和 KORA S4/F4 预测模型中的危险因素后,HR 分别为 0.54(0.31-0.95)和 0.53(0.29-0.97)。将归一化后的 HGS 加入到这些风险评分中,可通过 -2 对数似然、NRI 和 IDI 的差异来提高风险预测。使用敏感指标的性别特异性 HR 和风险预测结果表明,总体结果主要由女性结果驱动。

结论

将 HGS 的测量值添加到传统危险因素中可能会改善 T2D 的风险评估,尤其是在女性中。需要在更大的研究中进一步评估。关键信息握力(HGS)与 2 型糖尿病(T2D)风险降低独立相关,但尚未探讨其在 T2D 风险分类或预测中的作用。在这项针对老年白种人男性和女性的前瞻性队列研究中,将 HGS 的测量值添加到传统危险因素中可改善 T2D 的风险评估,尤其是在女性中。HGS 的评估简单且经济实惠,可能成为早期识别未来 T2D 高危人群的有价值的临床工具。

相似文献

1
Handgrip strength improves prediction of type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study.
Ann Med. 2020 Dec;52(8):471-478. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2020.1815078. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
2
Inverse Association of Handgrip Strength With Risk of Heart Failure.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2021 Jun;96(6):1490-1499. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.09.040. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
3
Association Between Handgrip Strength and Type 2 Diabetes: A Prospective Cohort Study and Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2023 Aug 2;78(8):1383-1391. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glac241.
6
Lower handgrip strength levels probably precede triglyceride glucose index and associated with diabetes in men not in women.
J Diabetes Investig. 2022 Jan;13(1):148-155. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13626. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
7
Handgrip strength is inversely associated with fatal cardiovascular and all-cause mortality events.
Ann Med. 2020 May-Jun;52(3-4):109-119. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2020.1748220. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
9
Normalized handgrip strength and future risk of hypertension: findings from a prospective cohort study.
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2021 Dec;55(6):336-339. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2021.1983206. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
10
Handgrip strength-A risk indicator for type 2 diabetes: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort studies.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2021 Feb;37(2):e3365. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3365. Epub 2020 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

2
Decreased muscle strength and thigh muscle area assessed with CT imaging in older Chinese adults with long duration of type 2 diabetes.
J Nutr Health Aging. 2025 Apr;29(4):100506. doi: 10.1016/j.jnha.2025.100506. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
4
Unraveling the role of muscle mass and strength in predicting type 2 diabetes risk: a systematic review.
Acta Diabetol. 2025 Feb;62(2):157-176. doi: 10.1007/s00592-024-02440-9. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
9
Gender-Specific Association of Handgrip Strength with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Chinese Han Older Adults.
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2023 Apr 1;16:913-923. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S400350. eCollection 2023.
10
Low relative hand grip strength is associated with a higher risk for diabetes and impaired fasting glucose among the Korean population.
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 6;17(10):e0275746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275746. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Handgrip strength-A risk indicator for type 2 diabetes: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort studies.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2021 Feb;37(2):e3365. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3365. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
2
Handgrip strength is not associated with risk of venous thromboembolism: a prospective cohort study.
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2020 Aug;54(4):253-257. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2020.1751267. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
3
Handgrip Strength Is Inversely Associated With Sudden Cardiac Death.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 Apr;95(4):825-828. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.02.029.
4
Handgrip strength is inversely associated with fatal cardiovascular and all-cause mortality events.
Ann Med. 2020 May-Jun;52(3-4):109-119. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2020.1748220. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
5
Prevention of type 2 diabetes by physical activity: What has history taught us?
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 Jul;36(5):e3308. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3308. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
6
Grip Strength: An Indispensable Biomarker For Older Adults.
Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Oct 1;14:1681-1691. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S194543. eCollection 2019.
7
Obesity, risk of diabetes and role of physical activity, exercise training and cardiorespiratory fitness.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2019 Jul-Aug;62(4):327-333. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
8
Quantifying the added value of new biomarkers: how and how not.
Diagn Progn Res. 2018 Jul 11;2:14. doi: 10.1186/s41512-018-0037-2. eCollection 2018.
9
Sauna bathing reduces the risk of stroke in Finnish men and women: A prospective cohort study.
Neurology. 2018 May 29;90(22):e1937-e1944. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005606. Epub 2018 May 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验