Unit of Oncological Pharmacy, IRCCS Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST), Meldola, Forlì-Cesena, Italy.
Unit of Hematology, IRCCS Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST), Meldola, Forlì-Cesena, Italy.
Minerva Med. 2020 Oct;111(5):455-466. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4806.20.07017-2. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
Over the last few years, we assisted to an increasing knowledge about acute myeloid leukemia (AML) pathobiology. However, outcomes remain unsatisfactory particularly for adult patients over 60 years old. Not surprisingly several cases of therapy-related AML (tAML) and secondary AML, both characterized by poorer prognosis, are more common in older population. For several decades initial therapy for AML remained unchanged and typically treatment consisted of an anthracycline combined with continuous infusion of cytarabine for 7 days, the so-called "7+3" standard regimen. The efforts made by the researchers to improve this standard schedule, have led to only modest improvement in the response rate (RR) but no change in overall survival (OS), until the recent evolution seen with new target specific mutation therapies. In 2017, a new liposomal-encapsulated formulation with daunorubicin and cytarabine (CPX-351) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of newly diagnosed tAML or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRCs). Based on the findings that ratiometric delivery may be more effective than administration of either drug at their maximum tolerated dose (MTD), CPX-351 was designed to deliver a fixed 5:1 molar ratio of the two molecules historically used in the standard "7+3" regimen, cytarabine and daunorubicin respectively. CPX-351 did show improvements of overall survival compared to traditional "7+3" in newly diagnosed secondary and therapy-related AML in adult patients. However, questions remain regarding how to select across AML patient subgroups to maximize the clinical benefit. Possible future directions include evaluating CPX-351 dose intensification, combining this liposomal formulation with targeted therapies and not least important a better understanding about the mechanism of improved responses in tAML and AML-MRC, two entities recognized to be less chemo-sensitive than other hematologic malignancies. In summary, CPX-351 offers finally something new in the landscape of AML therapy. Herein we will review the rationale behind this new drug product development, the main pharmacological characteristics, and discuss the results of clinical trials that led to its FDA approval at first and by EMA in 2018.
在过去的几年中,我们对急性髓细胞白血病(AML)的病理生物学有了越来越多的了解。然而,结果仍然不尽如人意,特别是对于 60 岁以上的成年患者。毫不奇怪,几种治疗相关的 AML(tAML)和继发性 AML 的病例更为常见,这两种病例的预后都较差。几十年来,AML 的初始治疗方法保持不变,通常治疗方法是用阿霉素与持续输注阿糖胞苷连用 7 天,即所谓的“7+3”标准方案。研究人员为改善这一标准方案所做的努力,仅使缓解率(RR)略有提高,但对总生存率(OS)没有影响,直到最近随着新的靶向特定突变治疗的发展才看到了变化。2017 年,美国食品和药物管理局批准了一种新的脂质体包封的柔红霉素和阿糖胞苷制剂(CPX-351),用于治疗新诊断的 tAML 或伴骨髓增生异常相关改变的 AML(AML-MRCs)。基于比率递药可能比给予两种药物的最大耐受剂量(MTD)更有效的发现,CPX-351 的设计是为了以固定的 5:1 摩尔比递药两种分子,这两种分子分别是标准“7+3”方案中使用的阿糖胞苷和柔红霉素。CPX-351 与传统的“7+3”方案相比,在新诊断的继发性和治疗相关的 AML 成年患者中,确实提高了总生存率。然而,如何在 AML 患者亚组中选择以最大化临床获益,仍存在疑问。未来可能的方向包括评估 CPX-351 剂量的强化、将这种脂质体制剂与靶向治疗相结合,以及最重要的是更好地了解 tAML 和 AML-MRC 中改善反应的机制,这两种实体被认为比其他血液恶性肿瘤的化疗敏感性低。总之,CPX-351 终于为 AML 治疗领域带来了新的选择。在此,我们将回顾这种新药产品开发的基本原理、主要的药理学特征,并讨论导致其在美国食品和药物管理局首次批准和在 2018 年在欧洲药品管理局批准的临床试验结果。