Suppr超能文献

[建立极重度烧伤患者死亡风险的列线图预测模型及预测价值]

[Establishment of nomogram predicting model for the death risk of extremely severe burn patients and the predictive value].

作者信息

Zeng Q L, Wang Q M, Tao L J, Hao F, Luo Q Z

机构信息

Department of Nursing, the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University (the Third Military Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China.

Department of Nursing, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2020 Sep 20;36(9):845-852. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190620-00280.

Abstract

To explore the death risk factors of extremely severe burn patients, establish a death risk nomogram predicting model, and investigate the predictive value for death risk of extremely severe burn patients. The medical records of 231 extremely severe burn patients (190 males and 41 females, aged 18-60 years) who were admitted to the Institute of Burn Research of the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University from January 2010 to October 2018 and met the inclusion criteria were analyzed retrospectively. According to the final outcome, the patients were divided into survival group of 173 patients and death group of 58 patients. The sex, age, severity of inhalation injury, total burn area, full-thickness burn area, burn index, rehydration coefficient and urine volume coefficient of the first and second 24 h after injury, the first base excess, shock index, and hematocrit (HCT) after admission, whether to have pre-hospital fluid infusion, use of ventilator, and use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), and abbreviated burn severity index (ABSI ) and Baux score on admission of patients in the two groups were recorded or calculated. According to the use of ventilator, the patients were divided into with ventilator group of 131 patients and without ventilator group of 100 patients, and the death, total burn surface area, burn index, incidence and severity of inhalation injury were recorded. According to the use of CRRT, the patients were divided into with CRRT group of 59 patients and without CRRT group of 172 patients, and the death, total burn surface area, and burn index were recorded. Data were statistically analyzed with test, chi-square test, and Mann-Whitney test to screen the death related factors of patients. The indexes with statistically significant differences between survival group and death group were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis to screen the independent death risk factors of patients, and the death risk nomogram predicting model was constructed based on the results.The Bootstrap method was used to validate the death risk nomogram predicting model internally. The predictive value of the nomogram model for predicting death risk of patients was detected by drawing calibration graph and calculating concordance index, and the death risk scores of 231 patients were acquired according to the death risk nomogram model. The receiver's operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn, and the optimal threshold and the sensitivity and specificity of optimal threshold in the ROC curve and the area under the curve were calculated. (1) There were statistically significant differences in burn index, ABSI on admission, severity of inhalation injury, total burn area, full-thickness burn area, rehydration coefficient at the first 24 h after injury, use of ventilator, use of CRRT, and Baux score on admission of patients between the two groups (=-7.696, -7.031, (2)=18.304, 63.065, 23.300, 13.073, 34.240, 59.586, =-7.536, <0.01). (2) There were statistically significant differences in death, incidence and severity of inhalation injury, total burn area, and burn index of patients between with ventilator group and without ventilator group ((2)=34.240, 17.394, 25.479, =-6.557, -7.049, <0.01). (3) There were statistically significant differences in death, total burn area, and burn index of patients between with CRRT group and without CRRT group ((2)=62.982, = -47.421, -6.678, <0.01). (4) The use of ventilator, use of CRRT, and burn index were independent risk factors for the death of extremely severe burn patients (odds ratio=3.277, 5.587, 1.067, 95% confidence interval=1.073-10.008, 2.384-13.093, 1.038-1.096, <0.05 or <0.01). (5) The initial concordance index of nomogram predicting model was 0.90 and the corrected concordance index was 0.89. The concordance indexes before and after correction were higher and similar, which showed that the nomogram had good concordance and predictive effect. The optimum threshold of ROC curve was 0.23, the sensitivity and specificity of optimum threshold were 86.0% and 80.0%, respectively, and the area under ROC curve was 0.90 (95% confidence interval=0.86-0.94, <0.01). Severe burns and damage and/or failure of organ are the main death causes of extremely severe burn patients. The death risk nomogram predicting model established on the basis of use of ventilator, use of CRRT, and burn index have good predictive ability for death of extremely severe burn patients.

摘要

探讨特重度烧伤患者的死亡危险因素,建立死亡风险列线图预测模型,并研究其对特重度烧伤患者死亡风险的预测价值。回顾性分析2010年1月至2018年10月陆军军医大学第一附属医院烧伤研究所收治的231例符合纳入标准的特重度烧伤患者(男190例,女41例,年龄18 - 60岁)的病历资料。根据最终结局,将患者分为存活组173例和死亡组58例。记录或计算两组患者的性别、年龄、吸入性损伤严重程度、烧伤总面积、Ⅲ度烧伤面积、烧伤指数、伤后第1个24小时和第2个24小时的补液系数及尿量系数、入院时首个碱剩余、休克指数、血细胞比容(HCT),是否有院前液体输注、呼吸机使用情况、连续性肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)使用情况,以及患者入院时的简化烧伤严重程度指数(ABSI)和博克斯评分。根据呼吸机使用情况,将患者分为使用呼吸机组131例和未使用呼吸机组100例,记录死亡情况、烧伤总面积、烧伤指数、吸入性损伤发生率及严重程度。根据CRRT使用情况,将患者分为使用CRRT组59例和未使用CRRT组172例,记录死亡情况、烧伤总面积和烧伤指数。采用t检验、卡方检验和曼 - 惠特尼U检验对数据进行统计学分析,筛选患者的死亡相关因素。将存活组和死亡组间差异有统计学意义的指标纳入多因素logistic回归分析,筛选患者的独立死亡危险因素,并根据结果构建死亡风险列线图预测模型。采用Bootstrap法对死亡风险列线图预测模型进行内部验证。通过绘制校准图和计算一致性指数检测列线图模型对患者死亡风险的预测价值,并根据死亡风险列线图模型获取231例患者的死亡风险评分。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,计算ROC曲线中的最佳阈值、最佳阈值的敏感度和特异度以及曲线下面积。(1)两组患者的烧伤指数入院时ABSI、吸入性损伤严重程度、烧伤总面积、Ⅲ度烧伤面积、伤后第1个24小时补液系数、呼吸机使用情况、CRRT使用情况、入院时博克斯评分差异有统计学意义(t = -7.696,-7.031,χ² = 18.304,63.065,23.300,13.073,34.240,59.586,t = -7.536,P < 0.01)。(2)使用呼吸机组和未使用呼吸机组患者的死亡情况、吸入性损伤发生率及严重程度、烧伤总面积、烧伤指数差异有统计学意义(χ² = 34.240,17.394,25.479,t = -6.557,-7.049,P < 0.01)。(3)使用CRRT组和未使用CRRT组患者的死亡情况、烧伤总面积、烧伤指数差异有统计学意义(χ² = 62.982,t = -47.421,-6.678,P < 0.01)。(4)呼吸机使用情况、CRRT使用情况和烧伤指数是特重度烧伤患者死亡的独立危险因素(比值比 = 3.277,5.587,1.067,95%置信区间 = 1.073 - 10.008,2.384 - 13.093,1.038 - 1.096,P < 0.05或P < 0.01)。(5)列线图预测模型的初始一致性指数为

0.90,校正后一致性指数为0.89。校正前后一致性指数较高且相近,表明列线图具有良好的一致性和预测效果。ROC曲线的最佳阈值为0.23,最佳阈值的敏感度和特异度分别为86.0%和80.0%,ROC曲线下面积为0.90(95%置信区间 = 0.86 - 0.94,P < 0.01)。严重烧伤以及器官损害和/或功能衰竭是特重度烧伤患者的主要死亡原因。基于呼吸机使用情况、CRRT使用情况和烧伤指数建立的死亡风险列线图预测模型对特重度烧伤患者的死亡具有良好的预测能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验