Suppr超能文献

核衣壳蛋白抗原快速检测在 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断中的准确性。

Accuracy of a nucleocapsid protein antigen rapid test in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

机构信息

Department of Medical Laboratory Center, General Hospital of Central Theater Command, Wuhan, China.

Microbiome Medicine Center, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Feb;27(2):289.e1-289.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.09.057. Epub 2020 Oct 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Rapid, reliable and easy-to-implement diagnostics that can be adapted in early severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) diagnosis are critical to combat the epidemic. SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (NP) is an ideal target for viral antigen-based detection. A rapid and convenient method was developed based on fluorescence immunochromatographic (FIC) assay to detect the SARS-CoV-2 NP antigen. However, the accuracy of this diagnostic method needs to be examined.

METHODS

This prospective study was carried out between 10 and 15 February 2020 in seven hospitals in Wuhan and one hospital in Chongqing, China. Participants with clinically suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection were enrolled. NP antigen testing by FIC assay and nucleic acid (NA) testing by real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) were performed simultaneously in a blinded manner with the same nasopharyngeal swab sample. The diagnostic accuracy of NP antigen testing was calculated by taking NA testing of RT-PCR as the reference standard, in which samples with a cycle threshold (C) value of ≤40 were interpreted as positive for SARS-CoV-2.

RESULTS

A total of 253 participants were enrolled; two participants were excluded from the analyses because of invalid NP testing results. Of 251 participants (99.2%) included in the diagnostic accuracy analysis, 201 (80.1%) had a C value of ≤40. With C value 40 as the cutoff of NA testing, the sensitivity, specificity and percentage agreement of the FIC assay was 75.6% (95% confidence interval, 69.0-81.3), 100% (95% confidence interval, 91.1-100) and 80.5% (95% confidence interval, 75.1-84.9) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

With RT-PCR assay as the reference standard, NP antigen testing by FIC assay shows high specificity and relatively high sensitivity in SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis in the early phase of infection.

摘要

目的

快速、可靠且易于实施的诊断方法对于应对疫情至关重要,这些方法可以应用于早期严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的诊断。SARS-CoV-2 核衣壳蛋白(NP)是病毒抗原检测的理想靶标。本研究基于荧光免疫层析(FIC)检测法,建立了一种快速、便捷的检测 SARS-CoV-2 NP 抗原的方法。然而,该诊断方法的准确性仍需进一步验证。

方法

本前瞻性研究于 2020 年 2 月 10 日至 15 日在中国武汉的 7 家医院和重庆的 1 家医院进行,纳入了临床疑似 SARS-CoV-2 感染的患者。以实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)的核酸(NA)检测为参照标准,同时采用 FIC 法对同一鼻咽拭子样本进行 NP 抗原检测,检测结果均以盲法形式判读。以 RT-PCR 的 NA 检测结果为参照标准,计算 NP 抗原检测的诊断准确性,其中 C 值≤40 判定为 SARS-CoV-2 阳性。

结果

共纳入 253 名参与者;由于 NP 检测结果无效,有 2 名参与者被排除在分析之外。在 251 名(99.2%)纳入诊断准确性分析的参与者中,201 名(80.1%)的 C 值≤40。以 NA 检测的 C 值 40 为截断值,FIC 检测的灵敏度、特异度和符合率分别为 75.6%(95%置信区间,69.0%81.3%)、100%(95%置信区间,91.1%100%)和 80.5%(95%置信区间,75.1%~84.9%)。

结论

以 RT-PCR 检测为参照标准,FIC 法检测 NP 抗原在 SARS-CoV-2 感染早期具有较高的特异性和相对较高的灵敏度。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of a nucleocapsid protein antigen rapid test in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Feb;27(2):289.e1-289.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.09.057. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
4
On-field evaluation of a ultra-rapid fluorescence immunoassay as a frontline test for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic.
J Virol Methods. 2021 Sep;295:114201. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114201. Epub 2021 May 28.
5
Rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection potentiates early diagnosis of COVID-19 disease.
Biosci Trends. 2021 May 11;15(2):93-99. doi: 10.5582/bst.2021.01090. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
6
Performance of a rapid antigen test in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
J Med Virol. 2021 May;93(5):2988-2991. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26830. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
8
Comparison of the SARS-CoV-2 Rapid antigen test to the real star Sars-CoV-2 RT PCR kit.
J Virol Methods. 2021 Feb;288:114024. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.114024. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
10
Analysis of a persistent viral shedding patient infected with SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR, FilmArray Respiratory Panel v2.1, and antigen detection.
J Infect Chemother. 2021 Feb;27(2):406-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2020.10.026. Epub 2020 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

2
Investigation of prolonged PCR positivity in COVID-19 patients.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 25;104(30):e43581. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043581.
3
Performance of protein N linear epitopes in serodiagnosis of COVID-19 infection.
Bioimpacts. 2024 Jun 26;15:30232. doi: 10.34172/bi.30232. eCollection 2025.
4
Comparison of a Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test with Real-Time PCR.
Infect Dis Clin Microbiol. 2024 Dec 19;6(4):298-305. doi: 10.36519/idcm.2024.421. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Clinical Evaluation of Commercial HARDSON COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test Kit for Routine COVID-19 Diagnosis.
Infect Dis Clin Microbiol. 2023 Jun 23;5(2):113-117. doi: 10.36519/idcm.2023.224. eCollection 2023 Jun.
9
Advances and Challenges in SARS-CoV-2 Detection: A Review of Molecular and Serological Technologies.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Feb 29;14(5):519. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14050519.
10
Overview of Nucleocapsid-Targeting Vaccines against COVID-19.
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Dec 3;11(12):1810. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11121810.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验