Suppr超能文献

参与急性护理随机对照试验的预先同意:一项范围综述方案

Advanced consent for participation in acute care randomised control trials: protocol for a scoping review.

作者信息

Niznick Naomi, Lun Ronda, Dewar Brian, Dowlatshahi Dar, Shamy Michel

机构信息

Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 16;10(10):e039172. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039172.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Informed consent is essential to clinical research, though obtaining informed consent for participation in research for emergency conditions is challenging. Adapted consent methods include consent from a substitute-decision maker, deferral of consent and waiver of consent. A novel approach is to use advanced consent, where a potential participant provides consent in the present in the event that they become eligible for enrolment into a future study. This scoping review will map and synthesise the literature on the use of advanced consent for participation and enrolment in randomised control trials for emergency conditions.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Guided by Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methodology framework, we will search electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials), the grey literature sources and reference lists of relevant studies. Eligible studies will include English language articles that discuss, examine or employ the use of advanced consent for enrolment in randomised control trials, specifically related to emergency conditions or emergency treatment. Diverse types of articles will be eligible for inclusion, including peer-reviewed qualitative and quantitative studies such as randomised control trials, observational studies, surveys, systematic reviews, as well as narrative reviews and ethics papers. Studies will be screened by two independent reviewers to determine eligibility for inclusion. Data on bibliographic information, study characteristics and methodology, and reported results, specifically author disposition, will be extracted and described using qualitative analysis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Formal ethics review is not required as primary data will not be collected. The findings of this study will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication. The findings of this study will help identify knowledge gaps that may guide areas for future research and may aid in the design of future clinical trials using advanced consent.

摘要

引言

知情同意是临床研究的关键所在,然而,在紧急情况下获取参与研究的知情同意颇具挑战性。适应性同意方法包括由替代决策者同意、延迟同意和豁免同意。一种新方法是采用预先同意,即潜在参与者在当下表示同意,前提是他们日后符合纳入未来研究的条件。本范围综述将梳理并综合关于在紧急情况下参与随机对照试验时使用预先同意的文献。

方法与分析

以阿克西和奥马利的范围综述方法框架为指导,我们将检索电子数据库(医学索引、荷兰医学文摘数据库、科学引文索引和考科蓝临床试验注册库)、灰色文献来源以及相关研究的参考文献列表。符合条件的研究将包括英文文章,这些文章讨论、审视或采用了在随机对照试验中使用预先同意以纳入研究的方法,尤其与紧急情况或紧急治疗相关。各类文章均符合纳入条件,包括同行评审的定性和定量研究,如随机对照试验、观察性研究、调查、系统评价,以及叙述性综述和伦理学论文。研究将由两名独立评审员进行筛选,以确定是否符合纳入条件。将提取关于书目信息、研究特征和方法以及报告结果(特别是作者倾向)的数据,并使用定性分析进行描述。

伦理与传播

由于不会收集原始数据,因此无需进行正式的伦理审查。本研究结果将通过同行评审出版物进行传播。本研究结果将有助于识别知识空白,这些空白可能为未来研究领域提供指导,并可能有助于设计使用预先同意的未来临床试验。

相似文献

1
Advanced consent for participation in acute care randomised control trials: protocol for a scoping review.
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 16;10(10):e039172. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039172.
7
Harm reduction for perinatal cannabis use: protocol for a scoping review of clinical practices.
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 10;14(12):e090453. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090453.
8
Barriers in health and social care access and navigation for elder orphans: a scoping review protocol.
BMJ Open. 2021 May 31;11(5):e043876. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043876.
9
Protocol for a scoping review study to identify and classify patient-centred quality indicators.
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 5;7(1):e013632. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013632.

本文引用的文献

1
Deferral of Consent in Acute Stroke Trials.
Stroke. 2019 Apr;50(4):1017-1020. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024096.
2
The Deferred Consent Model in a Prospective Observational Study Evaluating Myocardial Injury in the Intensive Care Unit.
J Intensive Care Med. 2018 Aug;33(8):475-480. doi: 10.1177/0885066616680772. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
3
Targeted Consent for Research on Standard of Care Interventions in the Emergency Setting.
Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan;45(1):e105-e110. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002023.
4
Confronting Ethical and Regulatory Challenges of Emergency Care Research With Conscious Patients.
Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Apr;67(4):538-45. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.10.026. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
6
Advance consent, critical interests and dementia research.
J Med Ethics. 2015 Aug;41(8):701-7. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102024. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
8
Scoping studies: advancing the methodology.
Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69.
9
Is emergency research without initial consent justified?: the consent substitute model.
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Apr 26;170(8):668-74. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.80.
10
A changing landscape for advance directives in dementia research.
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Feb;70(4):623-30. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.037. Epub 2009 Nov 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验