Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 20;10(10):e037591. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037591.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in critically ill patients and is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events and mortality. Oral anticoagulation for thromboembolism prophylaxis is a key component of managing AF in the general population and is recommended by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines. However, assessment tools used to aid decision making about anticoagulation have not yet been validated in the critical care setting. There is a paucity of data assessing the impact of anticoagulation strategies on clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with AF. We present a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of anticoagulation strategies for AF used specifically in critical care.
We will conduct a systematic review of the literature by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and PubMed databases for articles published from January 1990 to October 2019. Studies reporting anticoagulation strategies for AF in adults (>18 years) admitted to a general critical care setting will be assessed for inclusion. Outcomes of interest will include (1) percentage of patients started on anticoagulation in critical care for AF, (2) incidence of thromboembolism, (3) incidence of bleeding events, (4) intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, (5) hospital mortality, (6) ICU length of stay and (7) hospital length of stay. We will conduct a meta-analysis of trials. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomised trials or the Newcastle-Ottawa Risk of Bias assessment tool for non-randomised studies. This protocol and subsequent systematic review will be reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist.
This proposed systematic review will include data extracted from published studies; therefore, ethical approval is not required. The results of this review will be published in clinical specialty journals and presented at international meetings and conferences.
CRD42020158237.
心房颤动(AF)是危重病患者中最常见的心律失常,与血栓栓塞事件和死亡率增加相关。口服抗凝剂预防血栓栓塞是管理一般人群中 AF 的关键组成部分,国家卫生与保健卓越研究所指南推荐使用。然而,用于辅助抗凝决策的评估工具尚未在重症监护环境中得到验证。目前评估抗凝策略对 AF 危重病患者临床结局影响的数据很少。我们提出了一项系统评价和荟萃分析的方案,以评估专门在重症监护中使用的 AF 抗凝策略的有效性。
我们将通过搜索 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL 和 PubMed 数据库,对 1990 年 1 月至 2019 年 10 月发表的文献进行系统评价。将评估纳入研究报告的成人(>18 岁)入住普通重症监护室的 AF 抗凝策略。感兴趣的结局将包括 (1) 开始在重症监护中进行 AF 抗凝治疗的患者比例,(2) 血栓栓塞的发生率,(3) 出血事件的发生率,(4) 重症监护病房 (ICU) 死亡率,(5) 医院死亡率,(6) ICU 住院时间和 (7) 住院时间。我们将对试验进行荟萃分析。使用 Cochrane 随机试验偏倚风险工具或纽卡斯尔-渥太华非随机研究偏倚风险评估工具评估偏倚风险。本方案和随后的系统评价将按照系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选项目清单进行报告。
本拟议的系统评价将包括从已发表研究中提取的数据;因此,不需要伦理批准。本综述的结果将发表在临床专业期刊上,并在国际会议和会议上进行介绍。
CRD42020158237。