The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, The Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, Jerusalem, Israel.
Graduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Cereb Cortex. 2021 Jan 5;31(2):1211-1226. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa288.
Brain development and aging are complex processes that unfold in multiple brain regions simultaneously. Recently, models of brain age prediction have aroused great interest, as these models can potentially help to understand neurological diseases and elucidate basic neurobiological mechanisms. We test whether quantitative magnetic resonance imaging can contribute to such age prediction models. Using R1, the longitudinal rate of relaxation, we explore lifespan dynamics in cortical gray matter. We compare R1 with cortical thickness, a well-established biomarker of brain development and aging. Using 160 healthy individuals (6-81 years old), we found that R1 and cortical thickness predicted age similarly, but the regions contributing to the prediction differed. Next, we characterized R1 development and aging dynamics. Compared with anterior regions, in posterior regions we found an earlier R1 peak but a steeper postpeak decline. We replicate these findings: firstly, we tested a subset (N = 10) of the original dataset for whom we had additional scans at a lower resolution; and second, we verified the results on an independent dataset (N = 34). Finally, we compared the age prediction models on a subset of 10 patients with multiple sclerosis. The patients are predicted older than their chronological age using R1 but not with cortical thickness.
大脑的发育和衰老过程是复杂的,同时在多个脑区展开。最近,大脑年龄预测模型引起了极大的兴趣,因为这些模型可能有助于理解神经退行性疾病并阐明基本的神经生物学机制。我们测试了定量磁共振成像是否可以为这些年龄预测模型做出贡献。我们使用 R1,即纵向弛豫率,来探索皮质灰质的寿命动态。我们将 R1 与皮质厚度进行了比较,后者是大脑发育和衰老的一个成熟生物标志物。使用 160 名健康个体(6-81 岁),我们发现 R1 和皮质厚度对年龄的预测相似,但预测所涉及的区域不同。接下来,我们对 R1 的发育和衰老动态进行了特征描述。与前区相比,我们在后区发现了更早的 R1 峰值,但峰值后的下降更陡峭。我们复制了这些发现:首先,我们对原始数据集的一个子集(N=10)进行了测试,这些人在较低分辨率下进行了额外的扫描;其次,我们在一个独立的数据集(N=34)上验证了结果。最后,我们在 10 名多发性硬化症患者的子集中比较了年龄预测模型。使用 R1 预测这些患者比他们的实际年龄大,但使用皮质厚度则不然。