Fellow in the Massachusetts General Hospital Fellowship Program in Rural Health Leadership in Boston.
Founder of the Native American Emergency Medicine Consortium and a co-organizer of the Native American and Rural Emergency Medicine Conference.
AMA J Ethics. 2020 Oct 1;22(10):E874-881. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.874.
Racial identity is a complex idea, particularly for American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) populations. The idea of a single AI/AN race developed from a European-American view of phenotypic and cultural differences. It continues to have significant consequences for AI/AN populations within the clinical-medical context. For clinicians, using this flawed category in medical decision making poses ethical challenges and has implications for patient autonomy and justice. This article briefly traces the development of the idea of an AI/AN race, the concerns raised in using this identity marker, and the ethical implications of employing the categorization.
种族认同是一个复杂的概念,尤其是对于美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)群体而言。单一的 AI/AN 种族的概念源自于欧洲裔美国人对表型和文化差异的看法。它在临床医疗背景下,对 AI/AN 群体仍然具有重大影响。对于临床医生而言,在医疗决策中使用这种有缺陷的类别会带来伦理挑战,并对患者的自主权和公正产生影响。本文简要追溯了 AI/AN 种族概念的发展、使用这种身份标记所引发的关注,以及采用这种分类的伦理含义。