Suppr超能文献

加拿大安大略省转移性黑色素瘤二线依匹单抗的真实世界、基于人群的毒性和资源利用的队列研究。

Real-world, population-based cohort study of toxicity and resource utilization of second-line ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma in Ontario, Canada.

机构信息

Provincial Drug Reimbursement Program, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Cancer. 2021 Apr 15;148(8):1910-1918. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33357. Epub 2020 Nov 7.

Abstract

Second-line ipilimumab has been publicly funded in Ontario for metastatic melanoma (MM) since September 2012. We examined real-world toxicity of second-line ipilimumab compared to standard second-line treatments prior to funding. MM patients who received systemic treatment from April 2005 to March 2015 were included. Patients receiving second-line ipilimumab after September 2012 were considered as cases, and those who received second-line treatment prior to the funding date were included as historical controls. Outcomes assessed include treatment-related mortality, any-cause hospital visits, ipilimumab-related hospital visits and specialist visits (eg, endocrinologists, ophthalmologists, gastroenterologists, rheumatologists and respirologists), which were captured from up to 30 and/or 90 days after end of second-line treatment. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for baseline differences between groups. Odds ratios (ORs) from logistic regressions and rate ratios (RRs) from rate regressions were used to assess differences between groups. We identified 329 MM patients who received second-line treatments (ipilimumab: 189; controls: 140). Ipilimumab was associated greater any-cause (60.1% vs 45.7%; OR = 1.81; P value = .019) and ipilimumab-related (47.2% vs 31.9%; OR = 1.91; P value = .011) hospital visits. Adjusting for different follow-up days, ipilimumab was associated with higher rates of all-cause (RR = 1.56 [95%CI: 1.12-2.16]), and ipilimumab-related (RR = 2.18 [95% CI: 1.45-3.27]) hospital visits. Patients receiving ipilimumab were more likely to visit specialist involved in immunotherapy toxicity management (23.5% vs 13.7%; P value = .04). Compared to historical second-line treatments, second-line ipilimumab was associated with more health service utilization (specifically hospital visits and specialist visits), suggestive of potentially increased toxicity in the real world.

摘要

自 2012 年 9 月以来,安大略省已将二线伊匹单抗用于转移性黑色素瘤 (MM) 的公共资助。在资助之前,我们检查了二线伊匹单抗与标准二线治疗相比的真实世界毒性。包括 2005 年 4 月至 2015 年 3 月接受全身治疗的 MM 患者。2012 年 9 月后接受二线伊匹单抗治疗的患者被视为病例,而在资助日期前接受二线治疗的患者被纳入历史对照组。评估的结果包括治疗相关死亡率、任何原因的住院访问、与伊匹单抗相关的住院访问和专科访问(例如内分泌科、眼科、胃肠病学、风湿病学和呼吸病学),这些结果是在二线治疗结束后最多 30 天和/或 90 天内捕获的。采用逆概率治疗加权法调整组间基线差异。使用逻辑回归的优势比 (OR) 和速率回归的率比 (RR) 评估组间差异。我们确定了 329 名接受二线治疗的 MM 患者(伊匹单抗:189;对照组:140)。伊匹单抗与更高的任何原因(60.1% vs 45.7%;OR = 1.81;P 值 =.019)和伊匹单抗相关(47.2% vs 31.9%;OR = 1.91;P 值 =.011)的住院访问相关。调整不同的随访天数后,伊匹单抗与更高的全因(RR = 1.56 [95%CI:1.12-2.16])和伊匹单抗相关(RR = 2.18 [95%CI:1.45-3.27])的住院访问率相关。接受伊匹单抗治疗的患者更有可能访问参与免疫治疗毒性管理的专科医生(23.5% vs 13.7%;P 值 =.04)。与历史二线治疗相比,二线伊匹单抗与更多的卫生服务利用(特别是住院访问和专科访问)相关,表明在现实世界中可能增加了毒性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验