Suppr超能文献

[潮土中细菌和真菌群落对减施化肥并配施有机肥与秸秆的响应]

[Response of Bacterial and Fungal Communities to Chemical Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Organic Fertilizer and Straw in Fluvo-aquic Soil].

作者信息

Wu Xian, Wang Rui, Hu He, Xiu Wei-Ming, Li Gang, Zhao Jian-Ning, Yang Dian-Lin, Wang Li-Li, Wang Xin-Yi

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Original Agro-environment Pollution Prevention and Control of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Agro-environment and Agro-product Safety, Agro-environmental Protection Institute of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin 300191, China.

出版信息

Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2020 Oct 8;41(10):4669-4681. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202003068.

Abstract

To investigate the effects of chemical fertilizer reduction combined with organic fertilizer and straw on bacterial and fungal communities in fluvo-aquic soil under a wheat-maize rotation system in North China, a field-oriented fertilization experiment was performed at a trial base in Ninghe District of Tianjin. The differences in composition, diversity, and structure of bacterial and fungal communities were evaluated using five fertilization patterns (chemical fertilizer, F; chemical fertilizer reduction, FR; chemical fertilizer reduction combined with straw, FRS; chemical fertilizer reduction combined with organic fertilizer, FRO; chemical fertilizer reduction combined with organic fertilizer and straw, FROS) using Illumina high-throughput sequencing technology. Further, the main soil environmental factors driving the alteration of bacterial and fungal communities under different fertilization treatments were explored in combination with soil chemical analysis. The results showed that adding organic fertilizer (FRO) significantly increased the SOM content. In comparison with the FRS treatment, the TP content in the FROS treatment significantly increased by 13.33%. The AP content increased significantly after applying the FRO and FROS treatment, and it increased by 18.03%-33.45% and 22.69%-38.72%, respectively, as compared to that with the other treatments. The NH-N content of FRO and FROS treatments was significantly higher than that of chemical fertilizer treatments (F and FR), which was 2.14 and 2.23 times that of F treatment, and 2.23 and 2.33 times that of FR treatment, respectively. Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Acidobacteria were the dominant bacterial phyla for all treatments, with Ascomycota being the dominant fungal phylum. Based on the chemical fertilizer reduction combined with organic fertilizer, the addition of straw (FROS) significantly decreased the relative abundance of Actinobacteria. Under the FRS and FROS treatments, a significant decrease in the relative abundance of Gemmatimonadetes was observed. Moreover, the FROS treatment caused a significant decrease in the relative abundance of Planctomycetes and Verrucomicrobia. As for the fungal community, the relative abundance of Ascomycota was significantly increased under the treatments applying organic fertilizer (FRO and FROS). In comparison with the FR treatment, the FROS treatment significantly decreased the relative abundance of Mortierellomycota and Olpidiomycota, and the FRS treatment also showed a significant inhibitory effect on the relative abundance of Mortierellomycota. The Shannon index of bacterial community of the FROS treatment was significantly reduced by 1.26% and 1.25% in comparison with the F and FR treatments, respectively; the Chao1 index increased by 4.51% as compared with that of the F treatment. The Shannon index of bacterial community exhibited a significantly positive correlation with available phosphorus as well as ammonium content (<0.05). In comparison to the FR treatment, the FRS, FRO, and FROS treatments significantly decreased the Shannon index of fungal community by 29.85%, 24.94%, and 25.73%, respectively. A significantly positive relationship between the Shannon index of fungal community and available phosphorus content was observed. The community structure of bacteria of the FROS treatment was significantly different from that of F, FR, and FRO treatments, with the soil moisture, total phosphorus, pH, and available phosphorus as the major driving factors; the fungal community structure of the FRO and FROS treatments showed significant difference from that of the F and FR treatments, and the fungal community structure was mainly altered by total nitrogen, available phosphorus, and total phosphorus. In summary, our results indicated that the bacterial and fungal communities in fluvo-aquic soil exhibited a relatively strong response to the chemical fertilizer reduction combined with organic fertilizer and straw; meanwhile, the fungal community was also significantly influenced by chemical fertilizer reduction with organic fertilizer. Therefore, the organic fertilizer and straw drive the changes in the bacterial and fungal community composition, while improving the soil physicochemical properties. The fluvo-aquic fungi were more sensitive to the organic materials than the bacteria. Soil P was a common important influencing factor for regulating the bacterial and fungal community structure, and it should be paid full attention during the agricultural cultivation of fluvo-aquic soil.

摘要

为探究华北地区小麦-玉米轮作体系下,减施化肥并配施有机肥和秸秆对潮土细菌和真菌群落的影响,在天津市宁河区的一个试验基地开展了田间施肥试验。采用Illumina高通量测序技术,通过5种施肥模式(化肥,F;减施化肥,FR;减施化肥并配施秸秆,FRS;减施化肥并配施有机肥,FRO;减施化肥并配施有机肥和秸秆,FROS)评估细菌和真菌群落的组成、多样性及结构差异。此外,结合土壤化学分析,探究不同施肥处理下驱动细菌和真菌群落变化的主要土壤环境因子。结果表明,施用有机肥(FRO)显著提高了土壤有机碳含量。与FRS处理相比,FROS处理的土壤总磷含量显著提高了13.33%。施用FRO和FROS处理后,有效磷含量显著增加,与其他处理相比,分别增加了18.03% - 33.45%和22.69% - 38.72%。FRO和FROS处理的铵态氮含量显著高于化肥处理(F和FR),分别是F处理的2.14倍和2.23倍,FR处理的2.23倍和2.33倍。所有处理中,变形菌门、放线菌门、绿弯菌门和酸杆菌门是主要的细菌门类,子囊菌门是主要的真菌门类。在减施化肥并配施有机肥的基础上,添加秸秆(FROS)显著降低了放线菌门的相对丰度。在FRS和FROS处理下,芽单胞菌门的相对丰度显著降低。此外,FROS处理导致浮霉菌门和疣微菌门的相对丰度显著降低。对于真菌群落,施用有机肥处理(FRO和FROS)下子囊菌门的相对丰度显著增加。与FR处理相比,FROS处理显著降低了被孢霉门和油壶菌门的相对丰度,FRS处理对被孢霉门的相对丰度也有显著抑制作用。FROS处理的细菌群落香农指数与F和FR处理相比,分别显著降低了1.26%和1.25%;Chao1指数与F处理相比增加了4.51%。细菌群落香农指数与有效磷以及铵态氮含量呈显著正相关(<0.05)。与FR处理相比,FRS、FRO和FROS处理的真菌群落香农指数分别显著降低了29.85%、24.94%和25.73%。真菌群落香农指数与有效磷含量呈显著正相关。FROS处理的细菌群落结构与F、FR和FRO处理显著不同,主要驱动因素为土壤湿度、总磷、pH值和有效磷;FRO和FROS处理的真菌群落结构与F和FR处理显著不同,真菌群落结构主要受全氮、有效磷和总磷的影响。综上所述,我们的结果表明,潮土中的细菌和真菌群落对减施化肥并配施有机肥和秸秆表现出较强的响应;同时,真菌群落也受到减施化肥并配施有机肥的显著影响。因此,有机肥和秸秆在改善土壤理化性质的同时,驱动了细菌和真菌群落组成的变化。潮土真菌比细菌对有机物料更敏感。土壤磷是调节细菌和真菌群落结构的共同重要影响因素,在潮土农业种植过程中应予以充分关注。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验