Division of Laboratory and Transfusion Medicine, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Department of Biostatistics, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
J Infect Chemother. 2021 Feb;27(2):410-412. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2020.10.029. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
Rapid and simple point-of-care detection of SARS-CoV-2 is an urgent need to prevent pandemic. Reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) can detect SARS-CoV-2 more rapidly than RT-PCR. Saliva is non-invasive specimen suitable for mass-screening, but data comparing utility of nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) and saliva in RT-LAMP test are lacking and it remains unclear whether SARS-CoV-2 could be detected by direct processing of samples without the need for prior RNA extraction saliva. In this study, we compared utility of saliva and NPS samples for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 by a novel RT-fluorescence LAMP (RT-fLAMP). The sensitivity and specificity of the RT-fLAMP with RNA extraction were 97% and 100%, respectively, with equivalent utility of NPS and saliva. However, sensitivity was decreased to 71% and 47% in NPS and saliva samples without RNA extraction, respectively, suggesting that RNA extraction process may be critical for the virus detection by RT-fLAMP.
快速简便的即时 SARS-CoV-2 检测是预防大流行的迫切需要。逆转录环介导等温扩增 (RT-LAMP) 比 RT-PCR 能更快地检测 SARS-CoV-2。唾液是一种非侵入性标本,适合大规模筛查,但比较鼻咽拭子 (NPS) 和唾液在 RT-LAMP 检测中的效用的数据缺乏,目前尚不清楚是否可以通过直接处理样本而无需事先进行 RNA 提取来检测 SARS-CoV-2 唾液。在这项研究中,我们比较了新型 RT-荧光 LAMP (RT-fLAMP) 检测唾液和 NPS 样本中 SARS-CoV-2 的效用。经 RNA 提取的 RT-fLAMP 的灵敏度和特异性分别为 97%和 100%,NPS 和唾液的效用相当。然而,在不进行 RNA 提取的 NPS 和唾液样本中,灵敏度分别降至 71%和 47%,这表明 RNA 提取过程可能对 RT-fLAMP 检测病毒至关重要。