Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Graduate School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan.
Psychol Med. 2022 Oct;52(13):2606-2613. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720004584. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of telemedicine as a way to reduce COVID-19 infections was noted and consequently deregulated. However, the degree of telemedicine regulation varies from country to country, which may alter the widespread use of telemedicine. This study aimed to clarify the telepsychiatry regulations for each collaborating country/region before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
We used snowball sampling within a global network of international telepsychiatry experts. Thirty collaborators from 17 different countries/regions responded to a questionnaire on barriers to the use and implementation of telepsychiatric care, including policy factors such as regulations and reimbursement at the end of 2019 and as of May 2020.
Thirteen of 17 regions reported a relaxation of regulations due to the pandemic; consequently, all regions surveyed stated that telepsychiatry was now possible within their public healthcare systems. In some regions, restrictions on prescription medications allowed via telepsychiatry were eased, but in 11 of the 17 regions, there were still restrictions on prescribing medications via telepsychiatry. Lower insurance reimbursement amounts for telepsychiatry consultations in-person consultations were reevaluated in four regions, and consequently, in 15 regions telepsychiatry services were reimbursed at the same rate (or higher) than in-person consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Our results confirm that, due to COVID-19, the majority of countries surveyed are altering telemedicine regulations that had previously restricted the spread of telemedicine. These findings provide information that could guide future policy and regulatory decisions, which facilitate greater scale and spread of telepsychiatry globally.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,人们注意到使用远程医疗作为减少 COVID-19 感染的一种方式,并因此放宽了对远程医疗的监管。然而,各国对远程医疗的监管程度不同,这可能会改变远程医疗的广泛应用。本研究旨在阐明 COVID-19 大流行前后每个合作国家/地区的远程精神病学监管情况。
我们在国际远程精神病学专家的全球网络内使用滚雪球抽样法。来自 17 个不同国家/地区的 30 位合作者在 2019 年底和 2020 年 5 月回答了一份关于使用和实施远程精神病护理障碍的问卷,其中包括政策因素,如监管和报销。
17 个地区中有 13 个地区报告称由于大流行放宽了规定;因此,所有接受调查的地区都表示,远程精神病学现在可以在其公共医疗保健系统中实施。在一些地区,通过远程精神病学允许的处方药限制放宽了,但在 17 个地区中有 11 个地区仍然限制通过远程精神病学开处方药。四个地区重新评估了远程精神病学咨询的保险报销金额较低的问题,结果在 15 个地区,远程精神病学服务的报销率与 COVID-19 大流行期间的面对面咨询相同(或更高)。
我们的研究结果证实,由于 COVID-19,大多数接受调查的国家都在改变以前限制远程医疗传播的远程医疗监管规定。这些发现提供了信息,可以指导未来的政策和监管决策,从而促进远程精神病学在全球范围内更大规模和更广泛的应用。