Monash University Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Oct;30(10):792-803. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011793. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines recommend discussion by a multidisciplinary team (MDT) to review and plan the management of patients for a variety of cancers. However, not all patients diagnosed with cancer are presented at an MDT.
(1) To identify the factors (barriers and enablers) influencing presentation of all patients to, and the perceived value of, MDT meetings in the management of patients with pancreatic cancer and; (2) to identify potential interventions that could overcome modifiable barriers and enhance enablers using the theoretical domains framework (TDF).
Semistructured interviews were conducted with radiologists, surgeons, medical and radiation oncologists, gastroenterologists, palliative care specialists and nurse specialists based in New South Wales and Victoria, Australia. Interviews were conducted either in person or via videoconferencing. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, deidentified and data were thematically coded according to the 12 domains explored within the TDF. Common belief statements were generated to compare the variation between participant responses.
In total, 29 specialists were interviewed over a 4-month period. Twenty-two themes and 40 belief statements relevant to all the TDF domains were generated. Key enablers influencing MDT practices included a strong organisational focus (), beliefs about the benefits of an MDT discussion (), the use of technology, for example, videoconferencing (), the motivation to provide good quality care () and collegiality (). Barriers included: absence of palliative care representation (), the number of MDT meetings (), the cumulative cost of staff time (), the lack of capacity to discuss all patients within the allotted time () and reduced confidence to participate in discussions ().
The internal and external organisational structures surrounding MDT meetings ideally need to be strengthened with the development of agreed evidence-based protocols and referral pathways, a focus on resource allocation and capabilities, and a culture that fosters widespread collaboration for all stages of pancreatic cancer.
循证临床实践指南建议多学科团队(MDT)进行讨论,以审查和规划各种癌症患者的管理。然而,并非所有被诊断患有癌症的患者都在 MDT 中提出。
(1)确定影响所有患者提交 MDT 并对 MDT 会议在胰腺癌管理中的价值的因素(障碍和促进因素);(2)使用理论领域框架(TDF)确定可以克服可修改障碍和增强促进因素的潜在干预措施。
在澳大利亚新南威尔士州和维多利亚州对放射科医生、外科医生、医学和放射肿瘤学家、胃肠病学家、姑息治疗专家和护士专家进行了半结构化访谈。访谈可以亲自进行,也可以通过视频会议进行。所有访谈都进行了录音、逐字记录、去识别处理,并根据 TDF 中探索的 12 个领域进行了主题编码。生成了共同信念陈述,以比较参与者反应之间的差异。
在 4 个月的时间里,共对 29 名专家进行了访谈。共生成了 22 个主题和 40 个与 TDF 所有领域相关的信念陈述。影响 MDT 实践的主要促进因素包括强烈的组织重点()、对 MDT 讨论益处的信念()、使用技术,例如视频会议()、提供高质量护理的动力()和同事关系()。障碍包括:姑息治疗代表缺席()、MDT 会议次数()、员工时间的累计成本()、在规定时间内讨论所有患者的能力不足()和参与讨论的信心降低()。
MDT 会议的内部和外部组织结构需要通过制定商定的基于证据的协议和转诊途径、关注资源分配和能力以及培养广泛合作的文化来加强,以促进胰腺癌各个阶段的广泛合作。