Department of Primary Medical Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
Department of Primary Medical Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 27;10(11):e041762. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041762.
The aim of our study was to explore patient types in general practitioner (GP) practices and to quantify the regional differences of the frequencies of these patient types in northern Germany.
We conducted a mixed-methods study based on focus groups and standardised interviews with GPs. All counties and independent cities within a radius of 120 km around Hamburg were assigned one of three regional categories (urban areas, environs, rural areas). The focus groups were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Relative frequencies of consultations by patient types and differences between the regions were calculated. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify differences among regions.
Nine focus groups with 65 GPs (67.7% male). From the 280 initially recruited GPs 211 (65.4% male) could be personally interviewed.
Four themes with 27 patient types were derived from the focus groups: patients classified by morbidity, sociodemographic characteristics, special care needs and patient behaviour. Five patient characteristics were significantly more prevalent in urban areas than rural areas: patients with migration background and culturally different disease concepts (OR 1.23; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.42), privately insured patients (OR 1.17; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.31), educationally disadvantaged patients with low health literacy (OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.19), patients with psychiatric disorders (OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.12) and senior citizens living on their own without caregivers (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.31). Three patient types were significantly less prevalent in urban areas: minors accompanied by their parents (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.83), patients with poor therapy adherence (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.95) and patients with dementia (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99).
GPs could compensate the specific needs of their patients with medical training aligned with the requirements of their region. Urban GPs need skills treating patients with psychiatric, social and cultural problems, rural GPs regarding the care for children or noncompliant patients.
NCT02558322.
我们的研究旨在探索全科医生(GP)实践中的患者类型,并量化德国北部这些患者类型的频率的区域差异。
我们进行了一项基于焦点小组和 GP 标准化访谈的混合方法研究。汉堡周围 120 公里半径内的所有县和独立城市都被分配到三个区域类别之一(城市地区、郊区、农村地区)。使用定性内容分析对焦点小组进行分析。按患者类型计算就诊的相对频率,并计算各地区之间的差异。使用逻辑回归分析来确定各地区之间的差异。
来自 9 个焦点小组的 65 名 GP(67.7%为男性)。在最初招募的 280 名 GP 中,有 211 名(65.4%为男性)可以进行个人访谈。
从焦点小组中得出了四个主题和 27 种患者类型:按发病率分类的患者、社会人口统计学特征、特殊护理需求和患者行为。与农村地区相比,城市地区有 5 种患者特征更为普遍:具有移民背景和文化差异疾病概念的患者(OR 1.23;95%CI 1.06 至 1.42)、私人保险患者(OR 1.17;95%CI 1.05 至 1.31)、教育程度较低、健康素养较低的患者(OR 1.11;95%CI 1.04 至 1.19)、精神障碍患者(OR 1.07;95%CI 1.02 至 1.12)和独居无照顾者的老年人(OR 1.05;95%CI 1.05 至 1.31)。城市地区有 3 种患者类型明显较少:父母陪同的未成年人(OR 0.71;95%CI 0.61 至 0.83)、治疗依从性差的患者(OR 0.87,95%CI 0.80 至 0.95)和痴呆患者(OR 0.90;95%CI 0.82 至 0.99)。
全科医生可以通过与本地区要求相匹配的医学培训来满足患者的特殊需求。城市全科医生需要治疗精神、社会和文化问题患者的技能,农村全科医生则需要照顾儿童或不遵守治疗的患者。
NCT02558322。