Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Health Sciences, Université du Québec à Rimouski, Rimouski, Québec, Canada.
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Mar;60(3):e149-e158. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.09.017. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
This study examines the separate and combined relationships between occupational physical activity (characterized by nonaerobic activities such as heavy lifting and prolonged standing) and leisure time physical activity on future diabetes incidence.
Data from Ontario respondents aged 35-74 years from the 2003 Canadian Community Health Survey (N=40,507) were prospectively linked to the Ontario Diabetes Database for diabetes cases until 2017, with statistical analysis performed in 2019. Leisure time physical activity was self-reported and occupational physical activity estimated from occupation titles. The analytical sample consisted of 7,026 employed people without previous diabetes diagnoses, with 846 diabetes cases recorded. Cox proportional hazard models were constructed to evaluate relationships over a median follow-up time of 13.7 years.
No relationships were observed between occupational physical activity and diabetes. High leisure time physical activity was associated with lower diabetes risk for low occupational physical activity and stationary jobs (hazard ratio=0.63, 95% CI=0.47, 0.85). No association was found for high leisure time physical activity on diabetes risk for high occupational physical activity (hazard ratio=1.07, 95% CI=0.73, 1.56) or low occupational physical activity with movement (hazard ratio=0.92, 95% CI=0.55, 1.55).
This study suggests that physical activity recommendations exclusively recommending increased physical activity may only be effective for the sedentary part of the working population in reducing diabetes risk. Findings await confirmation in comparable prospective studies in other populations.
本研究考察了职业体力活动(以重体力劳动和长时间站立等非有氧运动为特征)和休闲时间体力活动对未来糖尿病发病的单独和综合关系。
本研究数据来自 2003 年加拿大社区健康调查中安大略省 35-74 岁的受访者(n=40507),并前瞻性地与安大略省糖尿病数据库相关联,以确定糖尿病病例,随访至 2017 年,统计分析于 2019 年进行。休闲时间体力活动由自我报告,职业体力活动则由职业头衔估计。分析样本包括 7026 名没有既往糖尿病诊断的在职人员,记录了 846 例糖尿病病例。构建 Cox 比例风险模型以评估中位随访时间为 13.7 年的关系。
职业体力活动与糖尿病之间没有关系。对于低职业体力活动和久坐工作,高休闲时间体力活动与较低的糖尿病风险相关(风险比=0.63,95%置信区间=0.47,0.85)。对于高职业体力活动(风险比=1.07,95%置信区间=0.73,1.56)或低职业体力活动与运动(风险比=0.92,95%置信区间=0.55,1.55),高休闲时间体力活动与糖尿病风险之间没有关联。
本研究表明,专门推荐增加体力活动的体力活动建议可能仅对减少糖尿病风险的工作人群中的久坐部分有效。这些发现有待其他人群中类似前瞻性研究的证实。