School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2021 Feb;51:102307. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102307. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
Exercise is recommended for the management of chronic low back pain (CLBP). Trialists have proposed numerous mechanisms to explain why exercise improves pain and function in people with CLBP, but these are yet to be synthesised.
To synthesise the proposed mechanisms of benefit for exercise in people with CLBP.
Review.
The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) was searched from inception to July 2019. Randomised controlled trials of adults with CLBP, indexed in PEDro as 'fitness training', were included. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data from each study. Data were analysed quantitatively and qualitatively using thematic analysis.
186 studies were identified and 110 were included in the analysis. Thirty-six studies (33%) did not provide a mechanism of benefit for exercise in people with CLBP. Of the remaining studies, most provided more than one mechanism, from which 33 unique mechanisms were identified. These were grouped into five themes which, from most to least common, were: neuromuscular (n = 105 (44%)); psychosocial (n = 87 (36%)); neurophysiological (n = 22 (9%)); cardiometabolic (n = 15 (6%)); and tissue healing (n = 12 (5%)). The effects of these proposed mechanisms on outcomes for people with CLBP were seldom examined.
This review identified a variety of mechanisms proposed in clinical trials to explain why 'fitness training' works for people with CLBP, but these mechanisms were seldom tested. Randomised controlled trials investigating the mediating effects of these mechanisms may be warranted to better understand why exercise works for CLBP.
运动被推荐用于慢性下腰痛(CLBP)的管理。试验人员提出了许多机制来解释为什么运动可以改善 CLBP 患者的疼痛和功能,但这些机制尚未得到综合。
综合 CLBP 患者运动获益的拟议机制。
综述。
从创建到 2019 年 7 月,对 Physiotherapy Evidence Database(PEDro)进行了搜索。纳入 PEDro 索引为“健身训练”的成人 CLBP 随机对照试验。两位审查员独立筛选并从每项研究中提取数据。使用主题分析对数据进行定量和定性分析。
确定了 186 项研究,其中 110 项研究纳入分析。36 项研究(33%)未提供 CLBP 患者运动获益的机制。其余研究中,大多数研究提供了不止一种机制,从中确定了 33 种独特的机制。这些机制被分为五个主题,从最常见到最不常见依次为:神经肌肉(n=105(44%));心理社会(n=87(36%));神经生理学(n=22(9%));心脏代谢(n=15(6%));和组织愈合(n=12(5%))。这些拟议机制对 CLBP 患者结局的影响很少被检验。
本综述确定了临床试验中提出的多种机制,以解释为什么“健身训练”对 CLBP 患者有效,但这些机制很少被检验。有必要进行随机对照试验来调查这些机制的中介作用,以更好地理解为什么运动对 CLBP 有效。