Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Apr;69(4):955-963. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16970. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: There are growing concerns about the safety and efficacy of psychotropic medications in Alzheimer's disease (AD). We sought to examine associations between psychotropic medication exposure and longitudinal change in cognitive, functional, and neuropsychiatric outcomes in a large clinical AD cohort.
Longitudinal observational study.
National Alzheimer's Disease Coordinating Center combining data from 39 Alzheimer's disease centers.
8,034 participants with AD dementia.
Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), and Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) Total. Probability of exposure to medication (the propensity score, PS) calculated via logistic regression. Medication classes included all antipsychotics (atypical vs conventional), antidepressants (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor [SSRI] vs non-SSRI), and benzodiazepines. Participants treated with a medication class were matched with participants not treated with that class with the closest-matched PS. The effect of medication treatment was assessed using linear mixed-effects models.
Participants had a mean (SD) age of 75.5 (9.8) years, and mean (SD) scores of MMSE 21.3 (5.7), CDR-SB 5.5 (3.4), and NPI-Q Total 4.5 (4.4). Mean duration of follow-up was 2.9-3.3 years depending on medication class. Non-SSRI antidepressant use was associated with better CDR-SB (2-year difference in change-DIC: -0.38 [-0.61, -0.15], P = .001). Atypical antipsychotic use was associated with greater decline on MMSE (DIC: -0.91 [-1.54, -0.28] P = .005) and CDR-SB scores (DIC: 0.50 [0.14, 0.86], P = .006). Notably, no drug class was associated with better NPI-Q scores.
Use of atypical antipsychotics was associated with poorer cognition and function, and no drug class was associated with improvement in neuropsychiatric symptoms.
背景/目的:人们越来越关注抗精神病药物在阿尔茨海默病(AD)中的安全性和疗效。我们旨在研究在一个大型临床 AD 队列中,精神药物暴露与认知、功能和神经精神结局的纵向变化之间的关联。
纵向观察性研究。
国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心,结合了 39 个阿尔茨海默病中心的数据。
8034 名 AD 痴呆患者。
简易精神状态检查(MMSE)、临床痴呆评定量表-总和(CDR-SB)和神经精神问卷(NPI-Q)总分。通过逻辑回归计算药物暴露的可能性(倾向评分,PS)。药物类别包括所有抗精神病药(非典型与传统)、抗抑郁药(选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂 [SSRIs] 与非 SSRIs)和苯二氮䓬类药物。接受药物治疗的患者与未接受该药物治疗的患者进行匹配,采用最接近的 PS 进行匹配。使用线性混合效应模型评估药物治疗的效果。
参与者的平均(SD)年龄为 75.5(9.8)岁,MMSE 平均(SD)评分为 21.3(5.7),CDR-SB 平均(SD)评分为 5.5(3.4),NPI-Q 总分平均(SD)评分为 4.5(4.4)。根据药物类别,平均(SD)随访时间为 2.9-3.3 年。非 SSRIs 类抗抑郁药的使用与 CDR-SB 更好相关(2 年变化差异-DIC:-0.38 [-0.61,-0.15],P =.001)。使用非典型抗精神病药与 MMSE(DIC:-0.91 [-1.54,-0.28],P =.005)和 CDR-SB 评分(DIC:0.50 [0.14,0.86],P =.006)的更大下降相关。值得注意的是,没有药物类别与更好的 NPI-Q 评分相关。
使用非典型抗精神病药与认知和功能下降相关,没有药物类别与神经精神症状的改善相关。